Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a genital skin disorder, including genital warts or residuals thereof, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current spine pathology, including residuals of a compression fracture of T-9 vertebra, is at least as likely as not related to service. The claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA medical opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed conditions and their relationship to service-connected disabilities. The claims will be reconsidered based on all additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the Veteran's testicle disorder and left foot disorder. The case will be returned for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to the failure to issue a Statement of the Case (SOC) for the annual clothing allowance claim. The Veteran must be provided with an SOC and given the opportunity to respond.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Board denied the appellant's claim to reopen a previous denial of service connection for the Veteran's cause of death. The new evidence submitted since the prior denial is not considered material and does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for additional compensation for a dependent child based on school attendance was denied as the evidence submitted by the Veteran did not meet the one-year deadline following his daughter's 18th birthday.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran is granted service connection for hypertension and initial noncompensable ratings for left and right foot hallux valgus.,Service connection was established for hypertension, but no compensable rating has been assigned for the bilateral hallux valgus.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2015
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection of gout of both feet.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected fracture of the left zygomatic arch.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and an opinion regarding his respiratory disorder. The Board will consider whether service connection can be granted based on presumed exposure or other theories.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to obtain information about the Veteran's marital status and divorce decrees from his first marriages.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The Veteran's estate is entitled to withheld benefits due and payable, as per the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5502(d).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to determine the cause of the Veteran's death and whether it was related to his service, including exposure to herbicides. The case is being remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2015
The appellant is eligible for improved death pension benefits because she had no countable income during the period on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The appellant's petition to revoke the forfeiture of her rights to VA benefits (except insurance benefits) under 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103(a) was denied by the AOJ in April 2008, and she withdrew her appeal prior to a Board decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2015
The Veteran's death was service connected, and the appellant received $2,000 in burial benefits. There is no legal basis for additional burial payments.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before the underlying claims can be adjudicated on the merits. The case is REMANDED for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim due to the need for additional development of his diabetes and right foot diabetic ulcers claims, which are inextricably intertwined with his current service connection claim. The case is now REMANDED for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2015
The Board is unable to determine the validity of the overpayment amount due to unclear documentation, and requires additional development to clarify how the $21,615.08 was calculated.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.