Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board found that the evidence submitted since the February 2008 rating decision is not new and material, as it does not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death. The fatal conditions causing his death are not linked to military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection for mild post-micturition incontinence and constipation, both claimed as secondary to his service-connected type 2 diabetes mellitus, are being remanded due to the inadequacy of previous VA examination reports. Additional development is needed including securing records from a private doctor visit, obtaining an updated medical opinion on the etiology of these conditions, and assessing the Veteran's employability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain private treatment records and schedule a VA examination to determine the etiology of his left eye disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for a right hip disability and granted secondary service connection for bilateral knee disabilities. However, further examination is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral hip disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran's peripheral vascular disease was not related to his active military service, including any herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's chronic periodontitis with bone dissolution and tooth loss does not meet the criteria for compensation purposes under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has determined that the VA examination is inadequate for purposes of adjudicating the Veteran's service connection claim and has ordered a new examination to address these issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right eye disorder is related to his military service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's claim for service connection for mouth sores has been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence, but the appeal is dismissed as the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disability and secondary service connection for an abdominal aortic aneurysm was denied. The Board found that the Veteran does not have a compensable service-connected dental condition, as his periodontitis is due to inadequate oral hygiene and infrequent dental care.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2015
The appellant has withdrawn her appeal seeking educational assistance under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and thus there are no remaining issues for appellate consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Board found that arthritis of the left hand did not manifest within one year of service and there was no continuity of symptoms. The Veteran's current disability is considered to be a direct result of an in-service injury, but not related to any disease or injury incurred during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for spindle cell lipoma of the neck due to a lack of examination and to verify his current address. The case will be adjudicated again after these steps are completed.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Veteran had pending claims at the time of his death, warranting consideration for accrued benefits purposes. The Appellant's claim was denied on procedural grounds but is now remanded to issue a statement of the case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for colon cancer and removal of lymph nodes due to insufficient evidence on file. The Veteran was exposed to asbestos during his active duty, but there is not enough information to determine if this exposure caused or contributed to his current conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for neurological disability of the bilateral lower extremities and urinary disability, both as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected low back disability. The case is to be addressed by the RO in a supplemental statement of the case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including a VA examination to assess whether the Veteran's urethrocutaneous fistulae with priapism is secondary to his service-connected segmental thrombophlebitis of the right leg.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2015
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia due to herbicide exposure is being remanded for further development, including verification of his claimed exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2015
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred on March 19 and 20, 2013, at Whidbey General Hospital was denied because he had coverage under a health-plan contract.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2015
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for residuals of a tongue, lip, and roof of mouth injury. The Veteran had in-service injuries to his tongue, lip, and roof of mouth which are considered direct service connection due to the nature of the injury occurring during active duty.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.