Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination. The Veteran's claim of service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, to include macular degeneration, is pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a shrapnel wound to the left thigh, as well as his requests to reopen claims for defective vision and a right hand condition. The decision also noted that the Veteran withdrew appeals regarding earlier effective dates for certain awards.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for SMC based on anatomical loss of one or both breasts is denied as the law does not allow for a retroactive award prior to the effective date of the liberalizing legislation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to her request for a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the RO. The case will be returned to the Board after the hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Board denied service connection for forgetfulness, finding that it was a symptom of the already service-connected PTSD and not separate from it. The claim to reopen was also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain additional medical records, conduct examinations for the Veteran's bilateral foot disability and service-connected dental condition, and determine whether the Veteran is unemployable due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Board has determined that the appellant, who is the Veteran's daughter and now deceased, was permanently incapable of self-support prior to her 18th birthday due to mental illness. Therefore, she is recognized as a helpless child for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Board has determined that the appeal is not about service connection and instead pertains to payment or reimbursement for medical expenses. The Veteran's claim was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, is denied as a matter of law.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for his 100 percent disability rating for service-connected psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, is also denied as a matter of law.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Board has ordered a paid and due audit to determine the correct dates for adding and removing the Appellant, her sons G.H. and D.H., from their DIC benefits award.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Veteran's death was not determined to be service-connected, and the appellant is not entitled to DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 because he did not meet the criteria for a 'deceased veteran' as defined in the regulation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Veteran's case is being remanded due to the need for a hearing before the Board at the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2014
The Board finds that the evidence is roughly in equipoise on whether prior authorization was given for the Veteran's care at St. Vincent's Ambulatory Care Center on April 1, 2011, and grants payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred during this episode.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2014
The Veteran withdrew his appeal, and the Board has dismissed it.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · June 2014
The Board denied service connection for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, finding that the cancer was not related to herbicide exposure in Vietnam. The appellant's claim is based on a presumption of exposure due to Agent Orange, but the VA Independent Medical Examiner concluded there was less than a 50% probability that the cancer was caused by this exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Board denied the appellant's request for a Government-furnished headstone or grave marker for the Veteran, finding that eligibility was not established due to the Veteran's death occurring prior to the date authorized by law.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Board has directed the RO to adjudicate both the TDIU claim and a separate issue of an increased rating for right upper extremity paresthesia. The case is remanded due to failure to comply with previous directives.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Veteran's claim of service connection for adenocarcinoma of the lung and bone metastasis was first received on October 19, 2010. The Board finds no earlier informal claim upon which an earlier effective date can be based.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have service connection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia or liver damage, as there is no evidence of current disabilities and the March 2012 VA examination concluded that his symptoms are related to an inherited disorder rather than active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2014
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for additional development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining outstanding treatment records.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.