Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2013
The Board has granted service connection for chronic psychosis and assigned an effective date of July 28, 1987. The Veteran's claim was reopened in 1987 based on new evidence submitted by her.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his shell fragment wounds have been denied as the evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's service treatment records do not show a diagnosis of malaria. The VA examiner found no medical evidence in the service treatment records to support a diagnosis of malaria and noted that the gastroenteritis/enteritis condition was an acute illness with no residuals. Therefore, the Board finds that service connection for malaria is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's discoid lupus erythematous clearly and unmistakably preexisted his second period of active service, which began in February 2003. The condition was also clearly and unmistakably aggravated by this period of service. However, the Board concluded that lupus is not etiologically related to any disease, injury or other event in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of his stomach disorder, specifically whether it is proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's service-connected old healed fracture of the fifth metacarpal bone of the left hand is currently evaluated as noncompensable. The Board finds that this evaluation adequately reflects the impairment caused by the disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's skin cancer, which includes basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, is considered a radiogenic disease. The VA determined that the Veteran was exposed to ionizing radiation during service in Japan from December 1950 to February 1951. However, due to lack of available medical records, the claim for service connection could not be substantiated.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Veteran's claim for service connection of a respiratory disorder is being remanded due to the inadequacy of previous examinations and the need for further medical evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Board has decided the case needs further medical evaluation and records to properly adjudicate the claim of service connection for peripheral vascular disease, which is secondary to service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have recognized active military service as required to establish eligibility for FVEC Fund benefits under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Veteran's claim for service connection for gouty arthritis is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination and additional development of his medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's cause of death was determined to be cardio respiratory arrest, secondary to a stroke. The Board found no service connection for the cause of death and denied eligibility for nonservice-connected death pension due to lack of evidence linking any condition to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary to resolve the validity of an overpayment of Department of Veterans' Affairs Chapter 30, Title 38 U.S.C., Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) education benefits. The case will be remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Veteran's request for special monthly compensation based on need for aid and attendance or by reason of being housebound has been remanded due to the failure to conduct a scheduled videoconference hearing. The Veteran will be notified of the date, time, and location of the rescheduled hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The appellant is not eligible for a one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund due to lack of qualifying service.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2013
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeal regarding the increased rating for the service-connected right foot condition. As a result, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review this matter.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2013
The Veteran's service-connected left little finger disability has been manifested by ankylosis at the PIP joint that would be equally well served by amputation at that level, and he is granted a 10 percent initial disability rating for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's left and right hip disorders are not related to her active service or a service-connected disability, including via aggravation. The disorders did not manifest within one year of her discharge from service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon did not have its onset during active service or within one year after service, and is not related to any in-service disease, event, or injury. It was also determined that it may not be presumed to have been caused by exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2013
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected prostatitis and for further development regarding his TDIU claim.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.