Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a dental disorder was denied as the evidence did not show any in-service trauma or disability that would qualify for compensation purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's subjective complaints of burning and tingling sensations in his feet are likely symptoms of his service-connected pes planus with plantar fasciitis, and thus have been attributed to a known clinical diagnosis. The evidence does not show any separate neurologic disorder involving his feet that had an onset during his period of service or is otherwise related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has remanded the case for a hearing at a local VA office due to the Veteran's request.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran's claim for a waiver of overpayment is being remanded due to missing evidence. The issue of whether his pension benefits should be reinstated, now that he has submitted income verification reports, will also be addressed on remand.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's appeal for basic eligibility for VA pension benefits was denied as he did not meet the requirements for active military service during a period of war.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of a compression fracture of C5 with degenerative changes have not met the criteria for a compensable evaluation prior to September 23, 2005, and an evaluation in excess of 10 percent since that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected right and left knee disabilities have been manifested by pain without compensable loss of range of motion, no objective evidence of ankylosis, lateral instability or recurrent subluxation. As a result, the criteria for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for both knees were not met.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for his service-connected residuals of fragment wounds to the left forearm has been granted, with a disability rating of 40 percent effective as of the date of decision. The Veteran is no longer seeking an increased rating for carpal tunnel syndrome of the left wrist.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board found that the amount of VA compensation benefits withheld for the purpose of recouping military drill pay for the period from 1995 through 1998 was correct, and denied the Veteran's appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board found that the appellant's discharge from service was under other than honorable conditions due to an AWOL period of 227 days. The appeal is denied as there is no evidence showing the appellant was insane at the time of his offense.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for her spouse J.P.D., finding that she did not provide timely notice of her divorce and remarriage, which resulted in overpayment. The Veteran argued that there was only a two-week gap between her marriage to S.L.H. and her marriage to J.P.D., but the Board found no evidence of such notification.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Veteran's claim for an initial disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent for status post fracture of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the left index finger has been denied as there is no evidence of ankylosis, arthritis, or other functional impairment that would warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran does not have a dental disorder for which compensation can be authorized.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his left upper extremity disability and whether he is unemployable due to service-connected disabilities. The case will be referred to the Director, Compensation and Pension Service, for extraschedular consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining chest X-rays and pulmonary function test results. The Veteran's lung disability is being evaluated to determine if it is related to exposure to asbestos during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Veteran's left knee disability, characterized by post-traumatic degenerative joint disease with frequent episodes of locking, pain and effusion, was found to warrant a 20 percent rating effective from the date of the initial claim.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedApril 2012
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left foot crush injury, but the issue remains on remand to determine if there is new and material evidence to reopen it. The Veteran's current left foot disability may be related to his active service, but further examination is needed to clarify this.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2012
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to obtain an addendum medical opinion regarding the Veteran's left leg shin splints and whether it is related to service. The Veteran will be given another opportunity to provide any additional evidence needed for his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Veteran's symptoms of Crohn's disease have most nearly approximated severe impairment with numerous attacks per year and malnutrition, warranting a 60 percent rating. The claim for TDIU is also granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2012
The Board has determined that macular degeneration is proximately due to or the result of service-connected atrial fibrillation and hypertension, and thus grants the Veteran's claim for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.