Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The appeal is being remanded due to a pending request for a videoconference hearing. The Veteran's eligibility for educational assistance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill remains unresolved.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for right knee chondromalacia patella and granted a grant of service connection based on it being related to his left knee disability. The Veteran's arthritis with chondromalacia patellae in the left knee is rated at 0 percent, while instability of the left knee is rated at 0 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran is not eligible for REAP educational benefits due to a determination by the Department of Defense (DoD) and VA cannot grant these benefits as they are bound by DoD's determinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's right thigh neurological disorder is related to his service-connected lumbar spine disability. His genitourinary disorder, diagnosed as urethra cancer, is presumed to have been incurred in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran seeks service connection for a leg disorder, other than osteoarthritis of the knee. The Board has remanded the case to obtain additional medical evidence and determine whether any diagnosed right leg disorder is related to her service-connected anemia and/or arrhythmia with suspected premature ventricular contractions and hypertensive heart disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current right leg disability that is related to service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The VA Medical Center denied payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses provided by Massena Memorial Hospital from March 21 to 23, 2009. The Veteran's claim is being remanded due to the need for further review and consideration of the June 2010 statement submitted by a physician.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · June 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by his adenocarcinoma of the stomach, which is presumed to be related to his military service due to herbicide exposure. The claim for service connection for the cause of death is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development, including a review of the claims file by a VA examiner and consideration of all evidence added since the last decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran's claim for osteoporosis, which is claimed as secondary to service-connected type II diabetes mellitus, has been remanded due to the need for additional development and an updated medical opinion regarding whether his osteoporosis is related to his diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The appellant's husband had no qualifying service and therefore does not meet the basic eligibility criteria for establishing entitlement to the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's cardiovascular disease, including bilateral carotid artery disease, did not originate in service or within one year thereafter and is not related to any incident of service. However, the weight of the positive and negative evidence was in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's cardiovascular disease, including bilateral carotid artery disease, is due to or caused by his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's period of active service is counted for purposes of repayment of an education loan, making her ineligible for benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date prior to June 1, 2009, for the addition of a dependent child to his nonservice connected pension benefits was denied by the Board. The decision states that the appellant did not provide sufficient information about his child's income and net worth until December 2009, which is more than one year after he initially claimed the dependency.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further adjudication due to issues related to stress incontinence. The Veteran's service-connected stress incontinence requires the use of absorbent materials six to seven times per day since May 26, 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of a chronic groin injury or head trauma in service, and the Veteran's current complaints are not related to his service-connected degenerative disc disease. Therefore, service connection for these conditions cannot be established.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of panic disorder with agoraphobia, finding that no formal or informal claim was filed prior to May 25, 2010.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bruxism warrants a 10 percent evaluation, effective August 12, 2004.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Veteran's service-connected dextroscoliosis with kyphosis is currently rated at 20 percent, the maximum schedular rating available for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not meet the criteria for service connection for bilateral chondromalacia patella or athletes foot/foot fungus, as there is no competent evidence showing current diagnoses of these conditions.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.