Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board is remanding the case to obtain additional medical records and provide a new VCAA notice letter. The issue of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death will be reconsidered.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the nature and likely etiology of any current skin disorders. The Veteran's service records show he had various skin conditions during his military service, but the examiner did not consider these prior diagnoses in their opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board finds that the appellant's discharge from military service is a bar to the award of VA benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further action, including scheduling a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · September 2010
The Board finds that the Veteran's follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is likely due to exposure to herbicides (Agent Orange) during his service at Nakhon Phanom Royal Thai Air Force Base in Thailand. As such, the claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination. The Veteran's claim of entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for right acromioclavicular joint arthrosis is on appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to incomplete records and need for further medical examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for compensation benefits pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional eye disability as a result of VA surgical treatment in 1997 and 1998 was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has ordered a psychological evaluation to determine if the appellant is developmentally disabled and capable of self-support prior to turning 18 years old. The case is being remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an orthopedic examination, and the Veteran's claim for service connection for arm numbness is now pending again.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's prostatitis has been rated as 40 percent disabling, which is the maximum schedular rating available for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected residuals of SFWs did not contribute to his death from myocardial infarction, which was determined to be a primary cause.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability is productive of no more than moderate limitation of range of motion, without ankylosis or incapacitating episodes. The Veteran does not have separately compensable neurological abnormalities associated with the condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected right ear otosclerosis is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination and consideration of referral for extraschedular evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant does not meet the criteria for basic eligibility for VA disability compensation benefits due to a lack of qualifying military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the issue of service connection for mitral valve disability due to insufficient examination findings and lack of a clear opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral leg and foot pain is not related to her service-connected low back disability, and thus denied both claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's genitourinary disorder is not considered to be due to VA treatment, and the Board finds that the preponderance of evidence does not support a grant of compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a supplemental opinion regarding whether the avascular necrosis of the hips was caused or aggravated by VA treatment using prednisone, and whether this treatment was reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's in-service back pain complaints did not result in a chronic disability, and there was insufficient evidence to establish a nexus between his current thoracic spine disability and service. The claim for service connection is denied.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.