Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current disability related to his in-service treatment of gonorrhea, and thus denied service connection for residuals of gonorrhea.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for flexor strain of the right hip is being remanded due to a lack of consideration of additional functional impairment during the appeal process. The RO must arrange for a VA orthopedic examination and consider whether 'staged rating' (assignment of different ratings for distinct periods of time, based on the facts found) is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development and notification regarding what evidence is needed to reopen claims for service connection, DIC, and Dependents' Educational Assistance.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · September 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was caused by his in-service exposure to Agent Orange, and he is therefore entitled to service connection for the cause of his death. The VA also granted entitlement to Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA).
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's right thumb disability is manifested by normal range of motion, hyperextensibility, decreased grip strength, and pain at the base of the thumb. The Board finds that a 10 percent rating is warranted for additional loss of function due to pain and weakness.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at a non-VA facility was denied as VA did not provide prior authorization and the Veteran had coverage under Medicare Part A and Part B.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for additional development, including consideration of whether preauthorization was received from VA for private emergency treatment.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred during a hospitalization at the East Jefferson Hospital from January 30, 2007, to February 19, 2007 is denied as he has coverage under a health-plan contract.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the failure of his representative to respond and prepare a VA Form 646. The issue on appeal pertains to education benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code (Montgomery GI Bill).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran seeks compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for complications from a ventral hernia repair performed by VA in April 2007, including peritonitis and enterocutaneous fistula. The Board has ordered further development to determine if the complications were caused by VA medical care.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary to determine the current state of the Veteran's disability due to a shell fragment wound, including an examination of muscle group functioning and its impact on his ability to work. The case is REMANDED for these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for additional compensation for a dependent spouse was denied as he did not submit the necessary information regarding his marriages and divorces in a timely manner.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the appellant's attempt to reopen her claim for revocation of the forfeiture of entitlement to VA benefits previously declared against her, finding that no new and material evidence had been presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran is deemed incompetent to handle his VA benefits, including the disbursement of funds.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's dysthymic disorder is related to his active service and the Board finds that he has established service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's income for the year 2006 exceeded the National Means Test threshold, and he was not eligible for treatment in VA's healthcare system without a copayment requirement.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has determined that additional development is necessary prior to the adjudication of this claim for service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of left foot cold injury and finds that new evidence supports a finding that his current symptoms are related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's appeal regarding a higher rating for his right foot dorsal exostosis and resection of neuroma was denied. The issue of service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder was also addressed, but the decision is not clear as to whether it was granted or denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the cause of the Veteran's death, is a disability incurred in service and granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.