Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied service connection for degenerative joint disease of the thoracic spine, finding that it did not manifest during or within one year after service and is not related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's digestive disorder, including PUD, is not etiologically related to service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected left paracentral disc protrusion at L5-S1 were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 20 percent from September 13, 2005 to December 31, 2006; 40 percent from January 1, 2007 to February 1, 2007; and 40 percent beginning April 1, 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran does not have a current skin disorder of the lower extremities that is due to herbicide exposure or other event of his period of service including his active duty in the Republic of Vietnam. The Board finds that there is no evidence to support the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran does not have a disability of the left leg other than osteochondroma of the distal left femur, and her claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder, finding that the Veteran did not have current residual disability and that his symptoms were attributable to pre-service conditions. The issue of cardiovascular disease was stayed pending final regulations establishing presumptions based on herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2010
The Board found that there was no clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the October 1969 rating decision regarding the right thigh and buttocks fragment wound, but did find CUE in the initial noncompensable rating for multiple superficial fragment wounds of the lower extremities. The effective date remains unchanged.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claims for recognition of J.E.V. and E.P.F. as legal spouses, and additional compensation for his dependent children J.D. and J.M., were denied due to unresolved issues regarding the validity of prior marriages.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for loss of teeth, finding that his teeth were extracted due to nonrestorable caries noted approximately two weeks after entry into active duty. As this occurred less than 180 days after entry, service connection was not established.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for a pulmonary and respiratory disorder has been withdrawn. The case is being remanded to the RO for further development regarding his claim of residuals from cold injuries.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2010
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of her appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has determined that the RO did not provide proper notice and is therefore remanding the case for compliance with due process requirements.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for service connection for the Veteran's cause of death, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's patellofemoral syndrome of the right knee did not warrant a rating higher than 20 percent, as his range of motion was limited to 90 degrees for flexion and 10 degrees for extension with pain.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board finds that the appellant's claim for an effective date earlier than February 4, 2005, for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death has not met the criteria. The effective date assigned is February 4, 2005, which was the date her claim for Dependency Indemnification was received.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The VA Regional Office has determined that the appellant's entire period of service was conditional, resulting in an other than honorable discharge. The case is being remanded to obtain additional information from the appellant's Official Military Personnel File and/or Military Personnel Record Jacket.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the Appellant's request for an earlier effective date of July 20, 2007 for death pension benefits, finding that she did not have a valid claim as her previous denial was final.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's relapsing polychondritis is causally related to service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has granted service connection for hammertoe deformities of both feet, finding that they are aggravated by the service-connected residuals of fractures of the left leg. The right foot hammertoes were not incurred in or aggravated by service, while the left foot hammertoes are found to be aggravated.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.