Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for body sores secondary to herbicide exposure during service. The case is remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and records.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran does not have a current heart disability and denied his claims for service connection and nonservice-connected pension benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the previously denied claim for service connection for residuals of an injury to the right great toe. The Veteran contends that he currently has residuals of an injury to his right great toe, which are believed to be related to a large metal beam falling on his foot during military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's cardiomyopathy was first diagnosed during service and is related to his period of active military service, warranting service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant's left rotator cuff tendonitis is attributable to service and granted her claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's right hip disability is manifested by pain and limited motion, but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as his flexion limitation is less than 30 degrees.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for specially adapted housing is being remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding the left lower extremity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has determined that further development is necessary to adjudicate the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of left eye injury. The case is REMANDED for obtaining all outstanding medical records and VA examination reports from the Kansas City VA medical center.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's adenocarcinoma of the prostate was not manifested by urinary leakage requiring absorbent materials changed less than two times per day, or daytime voiding interval between one and two hours, or awakening to void three to four times per night prior to November 11, 2008. Since November 11, 2008, the Veteran's adenocarcinoma of the prostate has not been manifested by urinary leakage requiring absorbent materials changed two to four times per day, or daytime voiding interval less than one hour, or awakening to void five or more times per night.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for chronic suppurative otitis media, finding that the maximum schedular rating had been assigned and no additional ratings were warranted based on evidence of other complications or diagnoses.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete records and will consider whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for thrombophlebitis of the right leg.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied as there is no competent medical evidence showing that he has a chronic disability manifested by pain, to include testicle pain, due to procedures performed at VA medical facilities in June 1992 and May 2007, as a result of carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the overpayment of $4,850 was properly created and is a valid debt. The appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's service is not considered active duty during a period of war, and thus he does not meet the eligibility criteria for nonservice-connected pension benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a stomach condition, including duodenal ulcer, hiatal hernia, and peptic ulcer disease (PUD). The new evidence provided by the VA examiners supports the reopening of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's request for waiver of overpayment was not timely, and as a matter of law, must be denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has ordered a new VA opinion to determine if the cause of the Veteran's death was related to service or any service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current sinus disability, including his nose injury sustained during service, is related to his in-service injury and finds that he should be granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating on an extra-schedular basis was denied as his disability is already rated at the maximum schedular rating.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.