Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Board found that reducing the Veteran's rating from 100% to 60% for residuals of squamous cell carcinoma of the right true vocal cords was proper, effective June 1, 2007. The Veteran's condition has been in remission since March 19, 2009.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized private medical expenses incurred on March 30, 2006 for diarrhea with bleeding and dizziness are eligible for reimbursement as the treatment was deemed necessary due to a prudent layperson expectation of serious health risk.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for a skin disorder, which he claims began during his military service. The Board has determined that the current VA examination is inadequate and remands the case to schedule the Veteran for an additional VA examination by a dermatologist to determine the nature and etiology of any current skin disorder, including whether it is related to his period of service or exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a new VA opinion regarding whether the Veteran's death from colon cancer was caused or contributed substantially or materially by his exposure to herbicides in Vietnam. The appellant is also required to provide VCAA notice and an appropriate period of time to respond.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant's income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate, thus denying her continuation of non-service connected death pension benefits from January 1, 2008.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 10 percent evaluation for residuals of shell fragment wound to the occipital region of the skull is denied as there was no medical evidence or informal communication noting any treatment for this condition between the last final decision and the April 2008 claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disorder, including obstructive lung disease, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and an opinion regarding whether his pre-existing respiratory disorder was aggravated during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran's claim for VA health care without copayment was denied in April 2008. The Board has ordered additional development due to missing documents, including the January 2007 VA Form 10-10EZR and copies of his tax returns submitted in December 2006.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have legal entitlement to a one-time payment from the FVEC fund due to lack of service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army, including the recognized guerrillas, in the service of the United States Armed Forces. The case is being remanded for further verification of the appellant's claimed service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has found that the appellant's deceased husband did not have service in a component of the Armed Forces of the United States, and thus there is no legal entitlement to VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses provided by King's Daughters Medical Center in Ashland, Kentucky, from February 27, 2008, to March 1, 2008, was denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2010
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeal regarding whether an IBOT Powered Mobility Wheelchair is medically suitable for his service-connected T-7 spinal cord injury due to a lack of jurisdiction, as this determination involves medical suitability rather than eligibility.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Board is remanding the case for further development, including obtaining a VA examination and addressing new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of DIC benefits, finding that the appellant's application was not received until many years after the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current genital rash disorder and there is no credible evidence linking any such condition to service. The claim for service connection for a genital rash was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for a new VA examination to determine if his gastrointestinal symptoms are related to active service, including exposure to undiagnosed illnesses or other conditions associated with service in the Southwest Asia theater.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Veteran's service-connected incomplete paralysis of the left and right upper extremities is currently rated at 10 percent, which does not meet his claim for higher evaluations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for anaplastic lymphoma, including as due to Agent Orange exposure. The Board has remanded the case for further development and readjudication.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2010
The Board finds that the Veteran's sudden death was due to a service-connected disability, granting the claim for service connection for the cause of his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's mild hemophilia A pre-existed his service and was not aggravated by it, thus denying the claim for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.