Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's skin disorder is presumed to be due to his exposure to Agent Orange during service. The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The February 1949 rating decision did not grant a separate 10% disability rating for myositis of each leg, as the Veteran's knee joints were unaffected by his condition. The claim was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board found that the appellant's OTH discharge from military service is a bar to VA benefits, and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's residuals of fracture to the distal fifth metacarpal on the right hand were not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or similar instance of fault.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility to VA benefits, including non-service connected pension benefits due to a lack of service as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army in the United States Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of a contusion to the right hand are currently rated as noncompensable, with no evidence of favorable or unfavorable ankylosis. The Board finds that he is not entitled to a compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's income for 2006 exceeded the threshold for eligibility for cost-free VA health care, and thus denied his claim for treatment without a copayment requirement beginning August 14, 2007.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and lack of clarity in determining whether a prudent layperson would consider the Veteran's situation emergent at the time she sought treatment.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Veteran's cervical spine disability is productive of pain, tenderness, spasm, and paresthesias comparable to pronounced intervertebral disc syndrome. The Board finds that the Veteran's service-connected cervical spine disability more nearly approximates the criteria for a 60 percent rating under the former Diagnostic Code 5293.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has determined that the evidence supports the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hammer toe deformity and painful calluses of the left foot, with resolution of reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and an expert opinion regarding whether his right foot disability was aggravated by VA treatment and/or two surgeries in 1997.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have qualifying service for the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund, and therefore denied legal entitlement to this benefit.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's multiple joint arthritis is not related to his service-connected residuals of rheumatic fever and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and arranging for a VA examination to determine if there is at least a 50 percent probability or greater that the Veteran has any gynecological disorder as a result of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's squamous cell carcinoma of the right vocal cord, characterized as hoarseness, has not resulted in thickening or nodules on the cords, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant changes on biopsy. Therefore, he is not entitled to a rating higher than 10 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has granted service connection for a skin rash, finding that the Veteran's current condition is related to his in-service exposure and resolving reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board is remanding the case to provide proper notice as required by Kent v. Nicholson, and to allow for further development of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's claim for a 60 percent evaluation for peripheral vascular disease of the right lower extremity is denied as it is not factually ascertainable that an increase in disability occurred within one year prior to May 19, 2006.,The Veteran's claim for a 60 percent evaluation for peripheral vascular disease of the left lower extremity is denied for the same reason.,The Veteran's claim for TDIU is denied as it is not factually ascertainable that he was unemployable due to service-connected disability within one year prior to May 19, 2006.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has granted service connection for tremors, finding that the Veteran's current tremor disorders are related to his military service and/or his service-connected psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for chest pain on June 21, 2007 are now covered by VA due to the nature of his service-connected disability and the emergency circumstances.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.