Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board found that the cause of death, metastatic colon carcinoma, did not develop during service or within a year after separation. The Veteran was not on active duty for training (ACDUTRA) at the time of his diagnosis and there is no evidence linking the cancer to any period of ACDUTRA. Therefore, the Board denied service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of recent financial information and potential procedural errors in contested claims procedures.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral shin splints and pes planus were denied, with the Board finding that there are no current objective findings specific to service-connected shin splints other than tenderness. The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for depressive disorder was granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for residuals of an aortic aneurysm, which he claims is related to injuries sustained during his active duty in the Navy. The Board has determined that additional development is needed before this claim can be decided.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was not caused by his service-connected conditions, and therefore denied dependency and indemnity compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 and eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran is not competent to handle his VA benefits due to mental incapacity, as evidenced by multiple hospitalizations and consistently low GAF scores.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran is seeking service connection for a neurological disability of both feet, which he claims was caused by exposure to cold weather during his military service in Korea. The Board finds that further development is needed, including obtaining medical records and confirming the Veteran's reserve duty periods.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on a need for aid and attendance was granted effective March 5, 2007. The effective date is the date of receipt of the claim due to the earlier date being March 5, 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill is denied as he did not meet the eligibility requirements due to his discharge from service being 'under honorable conditions (general)' and thus not qualifying for Chapter 30 benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant's residuals of a shell fragment wound of the right upper arm, including intermittent numbness and tingling, warrant a 40 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for cancer of the throat was denied because there is no credible evidence that he suffered an injury or disease during his active duty and his current condition does not meet the criteria for a disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for VA compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied as there is no evidence that his ventricular tachycardia, necessitating the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker, resulted from carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or an event not reasonably foreseeable during treatment for cardiovascular disability at a VAMC in January 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board finds that the appellant is not considered the surviving spouse of the Veteran and denies her claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if his service-connected varicose vein disabilities render him unemployable.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a new VA examination to assess his adjustment disorder with depressed mood and the impact on his ability to work. The TDIU claim will also be reconsidered.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized private medical services provided at Morton Plant Hospital from October 24, 2007 to October 26, 2007 are considered emergency treatment as no VA facility accepted him after he was notified and had the ability to be transferred. The Board grants payment or reimbursement of these costs.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · June 2010
The Board granted service connection for B-cell lymphoma on a presumptive basis due to exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's current skin disability did not have onset in service or within one year of service and is not etiologically related to his active service. The right ear hearing loss was also found not to meet the criteria for a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's chronic lymphocytic leukemia was not shown to be related to his military service, and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure. As a result, the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's s/p resection of the small bowel to include Meckel's diverticulum was characterized by symptoms such as diarrhea, intermittent cramps, and anemia. However, definite interference with absorption and nutrition was not shown.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.