Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for shortness of breath and finds that new and material evidence has been submitted. The Veteran's in-service plane crash is considered, but there is no direct or secondary evidence linking his current condition to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for nonservice-connected death pension benefits due to her income exceeding the maximum allowed amount.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA disability benefits due to a lack of qualifying military service, resulting in denial.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at Lakeland Regional Medical Center on November 9 and 10, 2006.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's application for enrollment in the VA healthcare system was denied due to his placement in priority category 8 and filing after January 17, 2003.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2010
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as the appellant requested withdrawal of the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected residuals of a right foot laceration with Achilles tendonitis was granted, and he is now rated at the highest available rating (20%) due to severe limitation of motion. His secondary service connection claim for back, hip, and knee disorders remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · June 2010
The Board found that the appellant's skin disability and right upper extremity disability with shaking and tingling were not incurred in or aggravated by active service, and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated due to exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Board finds that the evidence is in equipoise with regard to whether the service-connected left hip replacement more nearly approximates moderately severe or markedly severe residuals, warranting a 50% or 70% rating respectively. The Veteran's symptoms include pain and limited range of motion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's private physician diagnosed him as having restrictive, interstitial pulmonary disease and lung fibrosis. The VA examinations indicated a possible moderate restrictive component to the Veteran's pulmonary dysfunction, which may be secondary to asbestos exposure. The Board finds that another VA examination is needed to determine if the Veteran currently has any restrictive respiratory disorder or if there is a restrictive component of his respiratory disorder, and whether it is due to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's daughter contests the effective date of October [redacted], 2007 for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35, claiming her father should have been rated as permanently and totally disabled at the time of his death. The Board affirms the RO's decision to deny this claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran's claims for an initial rating higher than 30 percent for his adjustment disorder with depressed mood and a TDIU are being remanded due to the need for further examination and consideration of his service-connected disabilities, including his stomach condition and tension vascular headaches.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to a need to consider new legislation that may extend the Veteran's eligibility for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 1607.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Board is remanding the case for additional development to obtain service treatment and personnel records from the Veteran's reported Reserve unit in Monroe, Louisiana.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred from January 6-9, 2008 at Southern Tennessee Medical Center in Winchester, Tennessee are approved due to the emergent nature of his condition and the unavailability of a VA facility.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's death was not caused by VA treatment and did not result from any negligence or fault on the part of VA. Therefore, the appellant is not entitled to DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for residuals of bilateral femur fractures is denied as the evidence does not show malunion, fracture with nonunion without loose motion and weightbearing preserved with aid of brace, or severe recurrent subluxation or lateral instability of either knee.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2010
The Veteran is seeking payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred at St. Francis Hospital Bartlett from November 15, 2008, through November 18, 2008. The VA Medical Center denied the claim but has now remanded it due to incomplete records and need for additional opinions regarding transferability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Board found that the decedent did not have recognized service to establish basic eligibility for VA benefits, and thus denied the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2010
The Veteran's service-connected right knee disabilities have been evaluated as noncompensably disabling. The Board found that the criteria for a schedular rating in excess of 20 percent for post-operative patellofemoral syndrome and a schedular rating in excess of 10 percent for arthritis of the right knee have not been met.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.