Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the claim for service connection for esophageal achalasia, finding that it was not incurred or aggravated by service and is not related to a service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral venous stasis, leg ulcers, hyperpigmentation, ulcer aggravation, erythema and varicose veins were not incurred or aggravated in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining National Guard service records and VA treatment records. The Veteran will also be scheduled for a VA orthopedic examination to assess the nature and etiology of his back and heel disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of the evidence, including obtaining private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected left hip disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected spondylolysis, L5, was initially rated as noncompensable prior to January 9, 2007. From January 9, 2007 through December 11, 2008, the Veteran was granted a 10 percent disability rating for his condition. Effective December 12, 2008, he is entitled to a 20 percent disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain treatment records from the 1970s and an examination to determine whether his Alzheimer's disease is related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's current bilateral foot drop disability is not related to service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a more recent VA medical examination of his foot disorders, as the most recent evaluation was performed over three years ago.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the evidence submitted since the January 1999 rating decision is new but not material, and thus did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim of entitlement to service connection for a left arm injury.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran is granted a 60 percent rating for chronic pancreatitis, effective from the date of this decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's multiple myeloma is found to be service-connected as secondary to herbicide exposure, given his active service in the Republic of Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected right and left knee disabilities have been rated at 10 percent each since October 31, 2000. The Board has determined that the current ratings are not in excess of what is warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for initial compensable ratings for costochondritis and left ring finger fracture were denied. The appeal is not about service connection at all.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including a herniated nucleus pulposus and an adjustment disorder, are found to be so severe that they prevent him from securing or following substantially gainful employment. The Board has granted the TDIU based on this finding.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for his service-connected right knee disability must be remanded to allow for an additional VA examination and the consideration of any outstanding medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's spouse is not entitled to an extension of the delimiting date for DEA benefits due to a lack of medical evidence showing that she was prevented from initiating or completing her chosen program of education within the eligibility period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a more contemporaneous VA examination to evaluate the severity of his left leg varicose veins, and for obtaining complete treatment records from various VA medical centers.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board finds that the RO properly reduced the appellant's VA death pension benefits based on her receipt of income from SSA benefits effective July 1, 2005.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development due to inadequate VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's skin disorder of both feet was not incurred in or aggravated by active service. The Board found no current evidence of a skin disorder and denied the claim.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.