Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's prostate disorder is not related to his military service, and the Board finds that the preponderance of evidence is against a finding linking any current prostate disorder to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's current low back disability is not shown to be etiologically related to service and may not be presumed to have been incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for a right leg injury due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure, finding that these conditions did not meet the criteria for service connection under any theory of entitlement.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's current chronic gastrointestinal disability was not incurred in or aggravated by service, as there is no evidence of a relationship between his current condition and the viral gastroenteritis he experienced during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found no evidence linking the Veteran's current neck disorder to his active service, including a motor vehicle accident in 1976. The examiner opined that the condition is more likely due to aging and body habits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's lipoma of the neck was a pre-existing condition prior to his entrance into service and did not increase in severity during his period of active duty. Therefore, the claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a new VA eye examination to determine the nature and etiology of his current eye disorder, including whether it is related to or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left eye disability was not incurred or aggravated during service and is not related to any incident of service. As a result, the claim for service connection for a left eye disability is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran is seeking to establish service connection for his current emphysema and obstructive lung disorder, which he claims developed during military service. The Board has determined that a remand is necessary due to the need for an adequate VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's lichen simplex chronicus is currently rated at 60 percent, effective from February 1, 2008. The appeal for increased rating was granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's case is being remanded for a new examination to determine the current severity of his service-connected mitral stenosis, as the last VA examination took place in August 2006 and he contends that his symptoms have worsened since then.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected hammer toes with hallux valgus and calluses of both feet are currently rated at 10 percent each, the maximum available under Diagnostic Codes 5280-5282. The Board finds that these conditions do not warrant a higher rating as they do not present more than moderate impairment in either foot.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for scheduling a hearing before the RO (Travel Board). The Veteran does not have wartime service to establish entitlement to VA non-service-connected pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for a bilateral foot disability, finding that no new and material evidence was submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied a rating in excess of 30 percent for the Veteran's right shoulder disability, finding that the evidence did not support such an increase.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for education benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill - Active Duty (Chapter 30) and Montgomery GI Bill-Selected Reserves (Chapter 1606) were denied as she did not meet eligibility criteria due to her active duty service being less than two years, and her eligibility for Chapter 1606 expired in January 2000.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's condition was stable enough for him to be transferred to a VA facility on July 19, 2007. However, he could not have been safely transferred or discharged due to the lack of available VA facilities and his need for further treatment.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current lower back disability is related to his service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's dysthymic disorder has resulted in significant occupational and social impairment, warranting a higher evaluation of 70 percent.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.