Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining terminal records from Parkview Regional Hospital and possibly seeking a medical opinion. The claim will be reconsidered after these steps.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied because the evidence did not show that his back disability resulted in an additional disability due to VA treatment or lack of adequate treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for his service-connected bilateral pterygium is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA eye examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for service connection for the cause of her late husband's death, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claimed residuals of a cold weather injury to both lower extremities were not incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a corn on the left fifth toe and residuals of cold exposure, as there was no competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral tinea pedis was also denied due to the current disability not meeting the criteria for such a rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral knee disabilities have been granted and rated at 10 percent, effective July 22, 2003. The appeal is resolved in the Veteran's favor for increased ratings and an earlier effective date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's service-connected status post fracture, 2nd metatarsal, left foot does not meet the criteria for a disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent. The Veteran's service-connected mycotic dystrophy of bilateral toenails does not comprise 20 percent or more of the entire body or exposed areas affected and does not require systemic therapy such as corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs for a total duration of six weeks or more during the past 12-month period. As such, his increased rating claims are denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence and a need for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion on the etiology of the Veteran's current eye disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied service connection for thrombosis of the left leg, hepatic hematoma, and residuals of chest wall and rib injury in March 1997. The Veteran's claims for these conditions have been reopened but not substantiated by new evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Veteran's vertigo, staggering gait and dizziness are rated at 100 percent under DC 6205 due to attacks of vertigo and cerebellar gait occurring more than once per week.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further evidentiary development due to unclear information about the type of Social Security benefits received by the Appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and a medical opinion regarding the Veteran's condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran died in May 2006 from aspiration pneumonia at a private medical facility. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for nonservice-connected burial benefits as he was not discharged or released from active service due to a disability incurred in or aggravated by service, and his body was not being held by a state or national cemetery.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2010
The Veteran's appeal involves a claim for an increased rating for his service-connected basal cell carcinoma and a new service connection claim. The case is being remanded to obtain additional development, including obtaining a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's diplopia was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill during his cataract surgeries. The event (retrobulbar anesthesia) was considered reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2010
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for enlarged uterus and granted service connection for enlarged uterus and uterine fibroids. The left knee condition issue is being remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for ingrown toenails and dental treatment purposes have not been reopened. The appeals for increased ratings of bilateral pes planus with osteoarthritis of the right foot and osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine were denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Board denied the veteran's claim for basic eligibility to receive educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30 due to his election not to receive MGIB benefits when initially entering on active duty, and because he received more than $2,000 in tuition costs during each year of his participation in the NROTC scholarship program.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2010
The Veteran's appeal is denied as his left long and ring finger disability does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable VA rating schedule.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.