Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran does not have a currently diagnosed left leg disability that is service-connected or caused by his service-connected right ankle fracture. The Board finds the evidence against the claim outweighs any proffered lay assertions.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran's right elbow disability, including olecranon spur and degenerative joint disease, has been rated at 10 percent since April 28, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's orthopedic residuals of a left fifth metacarpal fracture did not warrant a compensable evaluation during any portion of the relevant period.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for onychomycosis of the feet was denied as there is no evidence that the condition extends beyond the toenails and nail bed, nor does it meet the criteria for a compensable rating under any applicable diagnostic code.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2010
The appeal has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA psychiatric examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected PTSD and determine if it renders him unemployable.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for his service-connected bladder and bowel incontinence ratings have been denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · April 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's death from pancreatic cancer was caused by his in-service exposure to Agent Orange, and thus service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board denied the appellant's application to reopen her service connection claim for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable rating for bilateral foot calluses was granted, and he is currently rated at 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an extension of his delimiting date for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, as there was no evidence that a physical or mental disability prevented him from initiating or completing an educational program during his basic eligibility period.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran's overpayment of $4,663.37 in compensation benefits is waived due to the fault being outweighed by VA's fault and because recovery would be against equity and good conscience.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses, including insurance premiums, incurred between July 2004 and March 2006 is dismissed as the Board does not have jurisdiction over this issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) was denied because there is no evidence of a current disability or in-service exposure to Agent Orange, which is required for presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran's Crohn's disease is productive of severe diarrhea with more or less constant abdominal distress, warranting a 30 percent evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board has determined that the submitted evidence is not new and material, thus denying the reopening of the claim for service connection for a duodenal ulcer.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Board found that the overpayment of VA educational assistance benefits was not valid due to administrative error, and thus granted the Veteran's claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The appeal is being remanded due to the appellant requesting a personal hearing before a Veterans Law Judge seated at the RO. The case will be handled by the Regional Office (RO) via the Appeals Management Center (AMC).
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's residuals of colorectal cancer (claimed as a stomach disorder) were not present during service or for many years thereafter, and were not caused by any incident of service including Agent Orange exposure or asbestos exposure. As such, the claim was denied.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.