Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of a fracture through the floor of the left orbit and left maxillary antrum are primarily manifested by subjective complaints, such as pain, tearing, transient blindness, and intermittent twitching. The preponderance of evidence does not support a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant does not have legal eligibility for nonservice-connected pension benefits due to lack of service in a 'regular' component of the United States Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inadequate VA medical examination in August 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his right shoulder disability was denied as the evidence does not support a higher evaluation based on current range of motion findings.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits at a full-time rate of payment was denied as he did not meet the criteria based on his participation in a non-accredited law school program, which resulted in him being eligible only for 3/4-time benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for his duodenal ulcer disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for left eye blindness is granted as his current condition is found to be incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for eligibility for loan guaranty benefits, stating that it was dependent on her entitlement to service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death. The case is being remanded for further development and readjudication.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran is granted special monthly compensation based on the need for aid and attendance of another person due to bilateral blindness with light perception only. The claim for automobile and adaptive equipment, or adaptive equipment only, is denied as there is no service-connected disability that would qualify under the law.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Board has determined that the July 1990 rating decision contained clear and unmistakable error in denying service connection for a back condition, and has granted an effective date of March 22, 1990 for the grant of service connection. The Veteran's hypertension is rated at 10%.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development due to the need for a compensation and pension examination regarding the Veteran's scleroderma.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to a discrepancy in hearing requests. The case will be returned for further development and scheduling of the appropriate Board hearing.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left hip replacement is related to his service-connected chronic low back strain, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Veteran is eligible for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code due to his honorable discharge as a conscientious objector and the convenience of the government.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence to trigger referral of the Veteran's case for a dose estimate and opinion regarding his liver cancer. The case is being remanded for these actions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2010
The Veteran's skin disability is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to determine if it may be related to his presumed herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board found that the Veteran and her boyfriend JB did not intend to be married, thus denying their claim for a common-law marriage.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's left inguinal hernia was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied her claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2010
The Veteran's private medical treatment incurred from July 10, 2005, to August 5, 2005, was not provided for a condition of such a nature that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected that delay in seeking immediate medical attention would have been hazardous to life or health and VA or other Federal facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of asbestos exposure is granted, as new and material evidence has been presented. The Veteran currently has benign pleural plaque secondary to asbestos exposure in service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.