Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current evaluations for his subtotal gastrectomy and vagotomy do not meet the criteria for a higher rating, as he does not have active ulcer or anemia symptoms. The scars resulting from the surgeries are also not shown to be painful, tender, or cause significant functional impairment.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's residuals of right cerebrospinal fluid otorhinorrhea originated with an in-service head trauma and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Veteran's varicose veins of the left leg are considered to have been incurred in service, and she is granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's lung disability is being remanded for further development to determine if it is related to service exposure, as the evidence of record is insufficient to decide the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's panhypopituitarism was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty, and thus denied service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied as there is no evidence of negligence, error in judgment or lack of skill in the treatment provided by VA during his December 2001 hospitalization and surgery.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claims for an initial disability rating in excess of 30 percent for hysterectomy, and effective dates prior to March 31, 2005 for service connection and SMC based on anatomical loss were denied. The Veteran's hysterectomy included removal of the uterus but not both ovaries.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The appellant's service records do not show active duty during a period of war, and thus does not meet the basic eligibility requirements for pension benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board found that the reduction from a 100% rating to a 20% rating for adenocarcinoma of the prostate was procedurally proper and determined that a 20% rating, based on voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction, is appropriate.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board finds that the appellant does not meet the legal requirements of being recognized as the Veteran's surviving spouse for purposes of receiving VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has granted service connection for a gastrointestinal condition, including reflux esophagitis with a hiatal hernia. The claim of residuals of a right leg injury is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bladder condition is reopened, but further examination and opinion are needed to determine if his current bladder disability is related to service. The Veteran also needs an examination to assess whether his right bundle branch block aggravated or caused his heart disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate information and need for further development, including obtaining private records from the Veteran's employers and affording him VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining medical records and considering new evidence. The claim will be readjudicated based on this information.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has granted service connection for the scar on the left lower lip residual to squamous cell carcinoma and assigned an initial noncompensable rating, which was later changed to a 10 percent rating effective from October 17, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen his claim regarding his character of discharge from military service, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2010
The appeal has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew their appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's request for a waiver of overpayment of educational benefits, finding that the appellant was primarily at fault in creating the overpayment and that recovery would not create undue hardship or defeat the purpose of his VA benefits. The decision also noted that the appellant had unjustly enriched herself by receiving higher education benefits than she was entitled to.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected Crohn's disease and its impact on his employability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal involves three separate issues regarding her service-connected spinal stenosis at L4-5. The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly assess the current nature and extent of her disability, including any associated neurological impairment.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.