Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2010
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death while the appeal was pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's service in the Philippine Guerilla is recognized, but his spouse does not meet the eligibility criteria for nonservice-connected death pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's period of active service was less than three years, and he did not meet the basic eligibility criteria for VA Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for reimbursement of private medical expenses incurred at Citrus Memorial Hospital due to lack of prior authorization and failure to meet eligibility criteria under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to scheduling issues for a Board hearing. The issue remains unresolved and will be handled by the RO/AMC.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board finds that the Veteran's medical treatment from November 27, 2005 to December 1, 2005 met the criteria for reimbursement under VA regulations due to a lack of availability of a VA facility and the nature of the emergency.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's nasopharyngeal carcinoma was caused by his in-service exposure to Agent Orange, resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's actions leading to the overpayment of pension benefits in an amount calculated as $13,759 constitute misrepresentation or bad faith. The Board finds that such actions by the Veteran were undertaken with intent to seek the unfair advantage of receiving VA pension benefit checks paid based only on his income from SSA benefits when he in fact earned income from self employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's systolic heart murmur does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA disability evaluation guidelines.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's service-connected right calcaneus fracture does not result in a moderate foot disability, and therefore, he is not entitled to a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board found that the Veteran does not have mycosis fungiodes and denied her claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's service-connected reflux esophagitis is currently rated at 10 percent, and the evidence does not support a higher rating as his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a more severe disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional development and evidence, including a VA dermatologic examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's psychiatric disability, diagnosed as psychosis not otherwise specified, is the result of an in-service disease or injury and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that his metastatic pancreatic carcinoma did not have its onset during service or was otherwise related to an in-service disease or injury.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Board has ordered the VA to obtain records of the Veteran's hospitalization for coronary artery disease at the Tucson VAMC in June 1989. The case is now remanded for further examination and opinion from a cardiologist regarding the onset and etiology of the Veteran's coronary artery disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the appellant's claim for death benefits as the surviving spouse of her deceased husband due to a lack of verified active military service with the U.S. Armed Forces, despite new evidence submitted.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at St. Mary's Medical Center on July 5, 2008 are approved as the treatment was necessary due to an emergency condition that would have been hazardous if delayed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating was granted, effective December 17, 2004. The case is now remanded to obtain updated treatment records and schedule the Veteran for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has determined that the appellant had active military service from October 15, 1955 to June 22, 1956 and therefore meets the requirements for basic eligibility of VA benefits.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.