Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2010
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim, and as a result, the character of discharge is no longer considered a bar to VA compensation benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to inadequate notice provided to the appellant regarding service-connected conditions and information needed to substantiate a DIC claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's monthly VA disability pension benefits were reduced due to his receipt of Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits, which increased his countable income. The reduction was proper as it did not exceed the maximum annual pension rate.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for additional compensation for dependents and dependent children was denied as there is no legal entitlement to such benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Veteran's claim is being remanded due to the need for VCAA notice, additional evidence, and a VA mental disorders examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's skin disorder and swollen joints were not shown to be present during service or caused by a disease or injury in service, including exposure to herbicides. Therefore, the claims for service connection are denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's appeal for reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's son does not have spina bifida, which is the only birth defect that qualifies for benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 18 due to herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's free-floating bone chip in the right heel with a right heel spur is related to his military service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete records, including an autopsy report and terminal hospital treatment records. The appellant's claim for service connection for cause of death is pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's spouse is not eligible for Dependents' Educational Assistance benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35 due to failing to meet the criteria for an extension of the delimiting period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for throat cancer is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's claim for reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at Verdugo Hills Hospital on June 16, 2006 is granted as the condition was an emergency requiring immediate attention.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Board denied the claim of CUE in the March 19, 2003 rating decision for failing to address a claim for bilateral ankle arthritis. The Veteran appealed the denial with respect to the low back and knees but not the ankles.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits in the amount of $3,021.42 was denied due to his current financial status showing expenses exceeding income and not basic necessities. The case is REMANDED for the submission of a current financial status report.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The appellant is not eligible for additional educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30 as a matter of law due to the nature of his commission and participation in the ROTC program.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's condition was stable enough for VA to transfer him to a VA facility on January 29, 2007. Therefore, the Board denied entitlement to payment or reimbursement of medical services provided by Winter Haven Hospital starting from February 1, 2007.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete documentation and procedural issues, including a lack of educational assistance file. The claim will be reconsidered under specific regulations for extension of delimiting date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further examination and development due to the lack of compliance with instructions in previous decisions.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Veteran's dyspepsia is manifested by pyrosis and dysphagia, but does not meet the criteria for a higher disability rating as it does not result in regurgitation or substernal/shoulder pain. The current 10 percent evaluation adequately compensates his condition.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.