Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional records related to hearing tests and job applications. The claim will be reconsidered after these records are obtained.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's service connection claim for a fungal infection, previously denied, is now granted as the evidence supports that his current condition is related to his in-service diagnosis and treatment.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the appellant's husband was discharged under conditions other than honorable due to an absence without leave (AWOL) for over 180 days. The appellant argued that her husband had been released from military service due to General Demobilization and a presidential order disbanding the Guerilla Movement, but this evidence did not support his claim of compelling circumstances.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has remanded the case for scheduling a Travel Board hearing and further development. The appellant's appeal is not about service connection, so no decision on that issue can be made.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for lost teeth, including as secondary to a septoturbinoplasty for a service-connected nasal septal deviation, is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for an abdominal aortic aneurysm incurred from February 16, 2005 to February 23, 2005 at St. Joseph were reimbursed due to the nature of his service-connected psychosis or schizophrenia and the circumstances surrounding the emergency treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Board has remanded the case for further development and readjudication due to the need to obtain additional evidence from the Veteran's former employer, Big C Machine Company.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right thigh infection was denied, and his claim for an increased rating for the scar on his right thigh was also denied. The Board found that there were no non-scar residuals of the right thigh infection other than a scar, and the current scar did not warrant more than a 20 percent disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess the current nature and severity of his service-connected fracture of the left zygoma. The RO will also consider whether the condition should be rated under different diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's left peroneal nerve injury and recurrent urinary tract infections are caused by the March 2005 VA hospitalization, but were not reasonably foreseeable complications of the treatment.,VA compensation benefits for both conditions are granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's lymphoma is causally related to trichloroethylene (TCE) and other chemical solvent exposure during his period of active service, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Veteran's spondylolisthesis at L4-5 has been rated as 60 percent disabling, effective from the date of the grant of service connection (December 11, 2000).
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's bilateral shin splints are rated as noncompensable prior to January 16, 2009 and as 10 percent disabling beginning January 16, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the appellant did not have qualifying military service for VA benefits, including the one-time payment from the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation Fund.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's cause of death, heart failure, was not caused by or substantially contributed to by any disability incurred in or aggravated by his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2009
The Board found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a right lung condition, which was previously denied in April 1994. The Veteran's current lung disorder is being considered as potentially related to his service-connected gunshot wound.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran's claims of service connection for bowel incontinence, loss of bladder control, and numbness of the groin and rectum are being remanded due to the need for additional development. His claim for a higher rating for his service-connected adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood is also being remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2009
The Veteran seeks service connection for residuals of cold injury to his hands, including arthritis. The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete medical records and the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right great toe crush injury, which he contends occurred during service, is related to his military service and grants service connection for residuals of a crush injury to the right great toe.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a residual infection of Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain disease, to include a blood disease is denied as there is no current diagnosis or treatment. The Veteran's claim for service connection for a digestive disability (claimed as heartburn) is remanded due to the need for updated VA examination with nexus opinion.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.