Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2009
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for a VA examination to assess her employability due to service-connected disabilities, and the readjudication of her case.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Veteran's actinic keratosis with excision of squamous cell carcinoma affects approximately 65 percent of his total body and 15 percent of exposed surfaces, warranting an initial 60 percent rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim to reopen his service connection for a bilateral knee disorder, diagnosed as DJD. The Board found that new and material evidence had been submitted since the last final denial of the claim in May 1992, including private medical records and an opinion linking the current condition to active duty service. As a result, the Veteran is now entitled to presumptive service connection for his bilateral knee disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Veteran's lumbar spine disorder is not productive of limitation of motion or degenerative disc symptomatology that meets the criteria for a higher evaluation. The Veteran's PTSD has been granted at 70 percent since August 11, 2004, but there is no indication that he was entitled to a 50 percent evaluation prior to April 4, 2002.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The appellant is not recognized as the surviving spouse of the Veteran for purposes of VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Veteran's disk herniation at L5-S1 with spinal canal stenosis is currently manifested by forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine limited to 40 degrees, which warrants a 20 percent rating under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. The Veteran does not have ankylosis or other conditions that would warrant higher ratings.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has granted an increased disability rating of 60 percent for the Veteran's service-connected gastrointestinal disability, finding that his condition meets the criteria for such a rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, scheduling a VA examination, and requesting additional information from the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board found no evidence of a chronic residual disability of a 'broken' tooth during service and concluded that the Veteran's current condition is not related to his military service. The appeal was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The case is being remanded to schedule the appellant for a video hearing due to an outdated mailing address.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for an injury to the right upper chest was found timely, and his claim is now on the merits. The issue of entitlement to service connection for PTSD remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board denied the appellant's claim for status as a veteran for VA benefits due to her lack of service with the U.S. Armed Forces.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Veteran claims compensation for the residuals of osteomyelitis and staphylococcus aureus infection of the right ankle due to VA medical treatment. The Board finds that additional development is needed, including obtaining all outstanding Salem VAMC records from July 2000 to March 2001.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that the evidence submitted since the July 1986 rating decision is not new and material, thus denying the reopening of the claim for service connection for a perforated left eardrum.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2009
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for a sinus disability has been withdrawn by the appellant prior to the Board's decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Board has determined that additional development of the evidence is required to properly address the Veteran's request for waiver of recovery of overpayment of nonservice-connected disability pension benefits. Specifically, a paid and due audit of the Veteran's pension account since October 2004 needs to be produced, followed by an updated Financial Status Report (FSR) from the Veteran. The Committee should then determine whether the debt is valid and properly created, including consideration of whether it was the result of sole administrative error by VA. If any portion of the overpayment remains unpaid after these determinations, a formal decision on waiver will be issued.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, which is now considered a heart condition. The Veteran's current diagnosis of recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is found to be related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there was no evidence linking his gastric and lung cancer to service or any reported exposure to herbicides. The Board also found that the conditions were not incurred in service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that the appellant does not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance. However, she is found to be permanently housebound by reason of disability and thus qualifies for special monthly pension at the housebound rate.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.