Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The appellant's child was born with a midline suboccipital encephalocele, which is not considered spina bifida for purposes of Chapter 18 benefits under the provisions of VA General Counsel precedent opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim as his son, A. E., could not be recognized as a child for VA purposes due to insufficient documentation of enrollment and attendance in a church school.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran is found not competent to handle VA funds due to mental incapacity.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board denied service connection for teeth numbered 2 and 15, finding no evidence of in-service trauma or other service-connected condition that could be linked to these teeth.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's skin condition, including jungle rot, had its onset during active duty and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratoses, which did not manifest in service or within the first postservice year, are not causally related to active service. Therefore, service connection for a skin disorder is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's residuals of prostate cancer are not productive of the criteria for a higher evaluation, and his claims for TDIU were denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Board has ordered the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to obtain a copy of a January 2006 letter from the Veteran's attorney, which was not previously included in their file. The VA must then review and complete any additional development needed before readjudicating the claims on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating and extraschedular evaluation for his post-operative residuals of a right L5-S1 partial hemilaminectomy and diskectomy was denied. He is currently rated at 40%.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's scoliosis was a congenital defect that existed prior to service and is not service-connected. However, the low back injury sustained during service aggravated his pre-existing scoliosis, warranting service connection for spondylolisthesis.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have residuals of a left eye injury or a skin disorder, and thus service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's Raynaud's syndrome warrants a disability rating of 40 percent, effective from when the claim was filed.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for impotence was originally filed on July 20, 1998. The effective date of the award is set at the date of receipt of his original claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence, resulting in a denial.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left eye injury as he failed to report for scheduled VA examinations without good cause.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of fracture of left distal tibia and fibula is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence, including x-rays.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate notice provided in the March 2008 letter, and further development is required.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's laryngeal cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by service, and the Board denied his claim as there is no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange. The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran had service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2009
The appeal for death pension benefits and accrued benefits has been dismissed due to the appellant's representative withdrawing the appeal. The case is being remanded for additional development regarding DIC benefits, including under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2009
The appellant's representative withdrew the appeal as to the issues of death pension benefits and accrued benefits at a hearing. The case is REMANDED for further development.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.