Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for post-operative hallux valgus of both feet, as they are already rated at the maximum 10 percent under Diagnostic Code 5280.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's current bilateral foot disabilities are not related to service, and the Board finds that his claim for residuals of bilateral foot injuries cannot be granted.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2009
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the death of the Veteran prior to its decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for reimbursement of unauthorized private medical expenses incurred during hospitalization from February 15 to 17, 2006 at O.H. Hospital because the treatment was not for a continued medical emergency and did not meet the criteria for payment or reimbursement under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Veteran's claims for an increased initial rating and earlier effective date for a separate disability rating for neurological impairment of the left lower extremity are being remanded to allow for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's right testicular atrophy was not incurred in or aggravated by service. The Board found that the Veteran has both testicles, contradicting his assertion of a surgically removed right testicle.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Board finds that the appellant as likely as not suffers from a recurrent, but chronic pulmonary disease process that had its clinical onset due to events that happened during his period of active duty for training.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for ulnar nerve disorder in both elbows and a bilateral hand disorder, as well as her request for an increased evaluation for cervical spine disability. The decision also found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen her claim of service connection for a bilateral hand disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's psychiatric disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating, and his service-connected disability does not preclude him from securing or following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's lumbar spine condition was initially rated as zero percent prior to June 9, 2003 and increased to ten percent effective June 9, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Veteran's right arm disorder was not found to be service-connected. His PTSD is rated at 70% and does not meet the criteria for TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound to the right upper forearm was granted, with a 30 percent evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Board has granted service connection for prurigo nodularis, finding that the Veteran's skin condition first manifested in service and is related to his active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for pneumothorax is being remanded due to the need for a VA pulmonary examination and issuance of a supplemental statement of the case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to conflicting opinions regarding whether the Veteran's left foot disorder is secondary to his service-connected back disability. The case will be returned for further development and readjudication.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's preexisting neurofibromatosis was not aggravated by active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board denied a compensable rating for the Veteran's deviated septum, status post septoplasty, finding that the current symptoms did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2009
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral subtalar coalition with spurring and arthritis warrants a 30 percent rating for each foot, effective from the date of the March 2004 VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim cannot be reopened because no new and material evidence was submitted, and his discharge from service was dishonorable for VA purposes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2009
The Board has determined that the case must be remanded due to inadequate VCAA notice and will need to provide proper notification before readjudicating the claims.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.