Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's current right eye disability was not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development of evidence and readjudication.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The recoupment of the Veteran's separation pay by withholding his VA disability compensation, in the after-tax amount of $16,005.01, is proper.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of a 90 percent disability rating for amputation, left upper arm, above insertion of deltoid was denied as there is no evidence showing that it is factually ascertainable that an increase in disability had occurred prior to April 16, 2004.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The Board dismissed the claim for an effective date earlier than February 10, 1981, for the assignment of a 100 percent schedular evaluation for schizophrenia as it found no legal merit to the appeal.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The claims for accrued benefits and reimbursement for expenses related to specially adapted housing were denied as a matter of law because the Veteran's application was pending at the time of his death and no certificate of eligibility had been issued.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a left eye disability, as there was no evidence that the VA treatment resulted in additional disability or that the proximate cause of any additional disability was due to fault on the part of VA.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to verify if the Veteran received voluntary separation incentives under 38 U.S.C.A. § 3018B.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The overpayment of VA education benefits in the amount of $1,686.60 was properly created and is a valid debt.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The claims for a compensable disability rating for left and right leg shin splints are being remanded to obtain additional evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran was denied eligibility for VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 32, Title 38, United States Code due to her failure to contribute to the program during her active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's right and left heel spurs were denied an initial compensable disability rating as the evidence did not demonstrate a moderate level of disability.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The matter of entitlement to permanent total disability status under 38 C.F.R. § 3.340(b) has been previously granted by the RO and, therefore, the matter is dismissed without prejudice to the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the Oakland, California, RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) for further development and adjudication.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical services provided by Bassett Hospital from March 24, 2007 to March 29, 2007 was denied because he had coverage under a health-plan contract (Medicare) that would pay in whole or part for the treatment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The Board finds that additional development is necessary before a decision can be rendered with respect to the Veteran's claim for entitlement to service connection for benign essential tremors.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and entitlement to DEA benefits, as there was no evidence that the Veteran's pancreatic cancer was caused by his exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of burns to the head, face, neck, and chest was denied because there is no current diagnosis of such conditions.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.