Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appellant's claim for increased DIC benefits based on the need for regular aid and attendance was denied as she does not meet the criteria to receive additional compensation.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic disability manifested by dizziness secondary to his service-connected cervical spine disability, as the preponderance of the evidence is against finding that the dizziness was caused or aggravated by the cervical spine disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appellant is not eligible for DIC benefits as she remarried after the age of 57, which precludes her from being recognized as the Veteran's surviving spouse.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, as there was no evidence showing that his death was related to any in-service disease or injury.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2009
The veteran's squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder with bilateral hydroureteronephrosis was rated at 60 percent, and his fecal incontinence remained at 30 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied service connection for a back disorder as there was no evidence of a current disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a lupus rash on the face, blood clots, and protein C deficiency as new and material evidence was not received to reopen the previously denied claims.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appellant was denied recognition as the surviving spouse due to evidence showing that she and the Veteran were divorced in January 1994, and there is no proof of a valid marriage or common law marriage.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMarch 2009
The Veteran's hammer toes on his right foot have caused pain, stiffness, weakness, fatigability, and decreased range of motion. Degenerative joint disease of the feet was not related to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appellant does not qualify as the Veteran's surviving spouse for DIC, death pension benefits, and accrued benefits purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The appeal to reopen the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death was denied as new and material evidence was not submitted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The Board remands the claim for further development and consideration, as there was not substantial compliance with a previous remand directive.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The veteran's peptic ulcer disease was not related to active military service.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a left leg injury, as there was no evidence of a chronic disability in service or within many years thereafter, and the diagnosed upper motor neuron lesion of his left lower extremity is not associated with active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2009
The Veteran's residuals of a right tympanomastoidectomy were incurred in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development and compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2009
The Board determined that the evidence did not support a claim for service connection for bilateral hip replacement as it was not related to the Veteran's service-connected low back disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2009
The Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities, and therefore, he is entitled to a TDIU.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.