Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board found that the evidence did not establish a service-connected disability as the cause of death or that the Veteran was diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2009
The application to reopen the claim for VA nonservice-connected disability pension benefits was denied as new and material evidence was not presented.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for assistance in appointing a representative.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The Board finds that a timely NOD was filed with the January 2006 rating decision that denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, and an appeal is pending in appellate status.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2009
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The appellant was denied basic eligibility for VA death benefits due to her participation in the fraud that led to the veteran's forfeiture of his rights.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2009
The Veteran is eligible for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at the Sarasota Memorial Hospital on March 5, 2006, through March 6, 2006, as he met all criteria under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1725.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The case is remanded for additional evaluation to clarify the Veteran's claim of service connection for schistosomiasis/bilharzia.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The appellant's claim for restoration of DIC benefits was denied as she remarried after the age of 57 and did not file her claim within the one-year period following the change in legislation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The case was remanded by the Court to provide the Veteran with an opportunity for a video conference hearing before a member of the Board.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for scheduling a videoconference hearing before a Veterans Law Judge of the Board.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining records from various VA facilities and addressing earlier effective dates for spousal dependency benefits and TDIU benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded for an examination to determine the Veteran's employability given his service-connected disabilities and educational background.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension was not service-connected as it was a result of his own willful misconduct, specifically substance abuse in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Veteran's genital and facial herpes did not meet the criteria for an initial compensable disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The appellant's claim for nonservice-connected disability pension benefits was denied due to a lack of qualifying military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to schedule the Veteran for a Travel Board hearing and an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current Reiter's syndrome.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2009
The Veteran was granted a 10 percent rating for residuals of simple fracture of the mandible effective January 28, 2004.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for adenoid cystic cancer, with metastasis, as there was no evidence of a causal connection to herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2009
The Veteran's left eye decreased visual acuity was aggravated by active service, but the right eye disabilities were not related to his service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.