Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2008
The Board has remanded the case for additional development and due process concerns. The appellant is to be scheduled for a videoconference hearing at the West Los Angeles RO before a Veterans Law Judge.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The veteran's hypertension and dysthymic disorder were evaluated, but the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating. The claim was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The Board found that the proximate cause of the veteran's claimed conditions was not due to VA carelessness, negligence, or similar fault. The events were not reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2008
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected duodenal ulcer is being remanded due to inadequate VCAA notice and the need for a contemporaneous VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2008
The veteran is seeking service connection for tarsal tunnel syndrome of the right foot as secondary to his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus and atopic dermatitis. The case must be remanded to obtain VCAA notice, additional VA treatment records, and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2008
The appellant's representative withdrew the appeal regarding VA burial benefits due to the Navy Department determining that his father served only on inactive duty status during his naval service, making him ineligible for a grave marker.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The Board found that the veteran's current left foot condition is not related to her service and denied her claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2008
The veteran was awarded a total disability rating based on individual unemployability effective December 1, 1993. The appellant is the dependent child of the veteran and is between the ages of 18 and 26 at the time of the award. She applied for Chapter 35 educational assistance and her application was received in October 2004. As she was within the age range specified, she may be eligible for an effective date of December 1, 1993.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2008
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his service-connected basal cell carcinoma is being remanded due to the need for additional examination and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The VA denied an initial higher rating for iritis, finding that the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on visual acuity or other symptoms.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her previously denied claim for basic eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs death benefits, stating that the new evidence submitted did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The veteran's application for an extension of her Montgomery GI Bill eligibility was denied because it was not submitted within one year from the end of her original period of eligibility and beyond one year from when she no longer had a physical disability preventing her from pursuing education.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected non-Hodgkin's lymphoma does not warrant an initial compensable rating due to the absence of active disease or treatment, and no residual physical effects have been observed.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2008
The veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the waiver of copayment charges for medical benefits before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2008
The Board has determined that the appellant is eligible for VA death benefits as the surviving spouse of the veteran, based on continuous cohabitation from the date of marriage to the date of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The appellant's countable income exceeded the maximum allowable rate for a surviving spouse with no children, and thus she is not eligible for improved death pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The veteran's claim for VA educational benefits was denied as he did not meet the basic service eligibility requirements provided by law.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2008
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for additional development, including obtaining in-service medical records and VA treatment records. The veteran is also required to provide any relevant private healthcare provider information.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2008
The Board found that the residuals of lower back strain had their onset during active military service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2008
The Board denied service connection for inflammatory arthritis and a sleep disorder, finding no evidence of current conditions or causation related to the veteran's active service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.