Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for erythematous scaling papules of the left temple and nose, finding no evidence linking the condition to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2008
The veteran's claim for service connection for a disability manifested by bilateral swelling of the feet was remanded to provide an examination and obtain his service medical records.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2008
The Board determined that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the appellant's claim of entitlement to restoration of death benefits as the veteran's surviving spouse.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2008
The veteran's PTSD is manifested by depression, sleep difficulty due to Vietnam nightmares, avoidance, hyperarousal symptoms, and difficulty with personal hygiene. The Board finds that the evidence supports an increased initial evaluation of 30 percent for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2008
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2008
The Board remands the case for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess the current severity of the veteran's residuals of a septoplasty.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2008
The Board finds it as likely as not that the veteran's current dental disorder is the result of his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2008
The Board remands the veteran's claims for service connection for a right hip disorder and a right leg disorder to schedule an additional hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The Board denied service connection for a skin disorder, finding no evidence of a chronic skin disorder in service or that the current skin symptoms are related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2008
The case is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA dental treatment records and scheduling a new VA dental examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2008
The veteran withdrew the appeal before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The veteran's arthritis of the right great toe is rated as moderately severe, and a higher rating was not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The Board found that the veteran's current right great toe disability was not related to his military service and denied service connection for residuals of a fracture of the right great toe.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2008
The veteran's multiple myeloma was granted service connection as it was caused by or the result of in-service radiation exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2008
The veteran's FMF was granted a disability rating of 60 percent, as the evidence showed that his condition exacerbated 3-4 times per year for often a week at a time, during which periods he experienced high fever, fatigue, and multiple symptoms.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2008
The veteran withdrew his appeal, and the Board has dismissed the case.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The veteran's initial rating for actinic keratoses, basal cell carcinomata, and squamous cell carcinomata was denied as the criteria for a higher rating were not met prior to August 30, 2002.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The Board found that the preponderance of evidence was against the appellant's claim for service connection for residuals of a concussion manifested by memory loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of medication prescribed by VA for a psychiatric disability was denied because the evidence did not show that his self-mutilating behavior and its residuals were caused by careless or negligent VA hospitalization or treatment, or an event that was not reasonably foreseeable.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2008
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 was denied as the additional disability due to VA surgical treatment in November 2001 was not caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on part of VA and was reasonably foreseeable.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.