Other conditions Board decisions

The appeal is remanded to the RO for proper VCAA notice and further development.

The Board found that the veteran did not suffer a head injury in service and denied his claim for service connection for residuals of a head injury.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable evaluation for his right inguinal hernia and service connection for an umbilical hernia.

The Board found that the preponderance of the evidence is against the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of cold injury to his lower and upper extremities.

The veteran's facial spasms are productive of severe symptoms, warranting a 30 percent disability rating.

The appeal is remanded for a VA examination to determine if any current jaw/dental disability is attributable to service.

The veteran's initial disability ratings for residuals of a left and right bunionectomy, currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling, were denied.

The veteran's need for a cholecystectomy was not caused by his November 2002 VA surgery, and therefore he is not entitled to compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.

The Board denied the veteran's attempt to reopen a claim for service connection for residuals of a wound or injury to the left leg, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.

The Board denied service connection for a skin rash, weakness of lower extremities, foot problems, and cardiovascular disorder as they were not shown to be related to the veteran's active service or exposure to herbicides.

The Board denied service connection for residuals of forearm fractures and found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen claims for back, leg, and stomach disabilities.

The Board denied service connection for lupus erythematosus as there is no evidence of a link between the veteran's current condition and his military service.

The veteran's claim for a total disability rating based upon individual unemployability (TDIU) was remanded to obtain additional evidence and an appropriate VA examination.

The appellant is not entitled to DEA benefits beyond June 24, 2005.

The motion for revision of the January 2001 Board decision on the grounds of clear and unmistakable error was denied.

The Board remands the case for a VA medical examination to determine if the veteran's current right hip disability is related to an in-service truck accident.

The appeal for a higher disability rating for the veteran's duodenal ulcer was denied, and the appeal regarding the combined schedular rating was withdrawn by the veteran.

The appeal is remanded to the Board of Veterans' Appeals for further development and readjudication.

The veteran's appeal for an extension of his eligibility for educational assistance benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill is being remanded to clarify representation and schedule a Travel Board hearing.

The veteran is unable to obtain or maintain any form of substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and occupational background due to the effects of his service-connected disabilities, which are currently assigned a combined rating of 80 percent.