Other conditions Board decisions

The Board has determined that the claim of service connection for an eye condition must be denied as there is no evidence of a current disability.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a blood disorder and prostate disorder, finding no current disabilities. The issues of whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen claims for low back disability and hypertension were also addressed but are remanded.

The Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and soft palate, with hypercalcemia contributing. The claim was not reopened as new evidence did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.

The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding the veteran's claim of residuals of nerve damage to the right ear, including clarification on a 'C&S' finding in a November 2005 VA clinical record.

The veteran is seeking service connection for a giant cell tumor of the tendons. The Board has ordered additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling an examination.

The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further examination and consideration of his claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or at the housebound rate due to his disabilities, including Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular accident residuals.

The Board finds that the veteran's income was excessive for purposes of eligibility for increased non-service connected pension based on the need for aid and attendance prior to 2006. However, beginning in 2006, the veteran's income has not been excessive for this purpose.

The veteran's recognized guerrilla service from November 1944 to May 1945 is not considered active military, naval or air service for VA non-service connected disability pension benefits purposes. Therefore, the veteran does not meet the basic eligibility requirements for such benefits.

The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information regarding the appellant's military service and need for further development.

The Board has determined that the VA examination is inadequate and requires a new one, as it did not address the veteran's claims for service connection for his muscle condition affecting the arms, back, and neck.

The veteran's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses is being remanded due to inadequate notice and development under the VCAA.

The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete notice and additional due process considerations are required before reviewing these claims.

The Board denied an increased rating for bilateral pterygium, finding that the current noncompensable evaluation adequately reflects the veteran's symptoms and disability.

The Board has remanded the case due to additional evidence submitted by the appellant's daughter, and further development is needed before a final decision can be made.

The veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than November 16, 2005, for a 100 percent rating for service-connected bronchiectasis of the left lower lobe with residuals of a lobectomy was denied as it was not factually ascertainable that an increase in severity had occurred prior to August 23, 2004.

The case is being remanded for further testing and counseling by a counselor who has not previously counseled the veteran, as well as obtaining his current VA clinical records. The determination will be reconsidered based on this additional information.

The appellant is granted monetary allowance as a child of a Vietnam veteran with spina bifida.

The Board denied the veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA improved pension benefits in the amount of $15,255 due to fault on his part and lack of undue hardship.

The VA has determined that the veteran's right hip disability, resulting from a total hip replacement, does not warrant a rating higher than 30 percent.

The veteran's appeal for non-service connected disability pension benefits was denied because his service did not meet the required criteria of 90 days of active duty during a period of war, as indicated in his personnel records and confirmed by further investigation. The veteran had lost time from his military service due to civilian imprisonment.