Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA death benefits due to a lack of service in the United States Armed Forces, as determined by the National Personnel Records Center.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the previously denied claim for service connection for residuals of a groin injury. The de novo issue of whether service connection should be granted will now be addressed.
The Board has decided that the appellant's claim for verified military service is remanded due to inability to verify his reported active duty with the U.S. Air Force from October 1955 to August 1956.
The veteran's application for enrollment in the VA medical healthcare system was denied as he is not eligible due to his income and net worth exceeding the low-income threshold.
The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of private medical services rendered on July 29, 2002 is denied due to his failure to submit a declaration that his claim met all conditions for payment by VA for emergency medical services.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for right eye disorder and an acquired psychiatric disorder, finding that his pre-existing conditions existed prior to service and did not permanently increase in severity during service.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for decreased vision of the right eye, as the additional evidence received does not suggest any additional disability due to VA surgery in March 1995.
The Board has determined that the veteran's OCD is related to his active duty service and grants service connection for this condition.
The VA has determined that the veteran's service-connected benign soft tissue fat necrosis of the left upper abdominal quadrant is not more than moderately disabling, warranting a 10 percent evaluation.
The Board has granted a 10% evaluation for shell fragment wounds of the right shin, but denied an increased rating for shell fragment wounds of the chin.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased disability rating for his service-connected shell fragment wound residuals and denied service connection for multiple tumors, including those claimed as secondary to herbicide exposure. The appeal was dismissed.
The Board found that the veteran's cause of death was not caused by or substantially contributed to by a disability incurred in service, and denied the claim for service connection.
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development due to incomplete information in the veteran's claims file.
The Board found that the veteran's current bilateral foot disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by service and denied his claim for service connection.
The Board found that the veteran's nasopharyngeal cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by his active service, and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated due to Agent Orange exposure. The other issues regarding bilateral ear disability and dry mouth were also denied.
The veteran's claim for non-service connected pension is remanded due to the lack of current income data. The RO must request updated information from the veteran and SSA.
The Board has determined that the veteran's sleep disorder is not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a nexus between his current condition and active military service. The other claimed conditions are also denied as there is no direct evidence linking them to service.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected cold injury residuals of both lower extremities, finding that the evidence does not warrant a rating in excess of 30%.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a chronic right leg disability, an ear disorder (claimed as dizziness), and residuals of cerebral hemorrhage. The Board found no current disabilities related to these conditions, and there is insufficient evidence linking any claimed disabilities to military service.
The Board denied service connection for an ear disorder, a skin disorder, and PTSD. The veteran's ear disorder was not related to his service, while the skin disorder did not manifest until after 1999. There is no evidence linking the current conditions to Agent Orange exposure or any other in-service event.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.