Other conditions Board decisions

The veteran's claim for a higher rating for residuals of fractures of the L3-L4 vertebrae is denied as his disability does not meet or approximate the criteria for a rating higher than 20 percent.,The veteran's claim for a higher rating for residuals of fracture of the left pelvis and acetabulum is denied as his disability does not meet or approximate the criteria for a rating higher than 10 percent.

The Board found that the veteran's congenital bicuspid aortic valve existed prior to service and was aggravated by dental treatment in service, leading to an unfavorable decision on his claim for service connection.

The veteran seeks service connection for a rectal condition that he claims began during his military service. The Board has ordered the case remanded to obtain additional medical records and to schedule the veteran for an examination to determine the current nature and likely etiology of the claimed condition.

The Board has determined that the veteran's skin disabilities, including basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis, were not incurred in or aggravated by active service. The veteran's tinnitus was also not found to be related to military service. Finally, there is no evidence of a current disability for bilateral hearing loss attributable to service.

The Board found that the veteran's right clavicle fracture residuals do not meet the criteria for a higher initial rating than 10 percent.

The Board found that the veteran's service-connected sinus bradycardia, right bundle branch block, and left anterior fascicular block have not caused or significantly contributed to his cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure conditions.

The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and providing proper VCAA notice.

The Board denied the appellant's claim for retroactive education benefits under Chapter 35, as payment could not be made prior to July 8, 2004 due to her initial application being received on that date.

The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence received after the last supplemental statement of the case, and the appellant is not eligible for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits and death pension benefits.

The Board has granted the veteran's claim for recognition of J.K. as his dependent child for purposes of VA benefit purposes, and therefore, the benefit sought on appeal has been granted in full.

The veteran's overpayment of additional VA disability compensation for a dependent child in the amount of $1,689 was denied as recovery would not be against equity and good conscience.

The Board dismissed the appeal due to the death of the appellant before a final decision was made.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 1606, Title 10, United States Code due to her not having active participation in the Selected Reserve and her eligibility terminating upon separation from the Selected Reserve. The appeal is based on a lack of entitlement under the law.

The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim for VA benefits based on her husband's qualifying service, finding that no new and material evidence had been submitted since the previous denial in October 1998.

The veteran's death was caused by anoxic encephalopathy, heart failure, and cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation. Service connection for these conditions is not warranted as they are not related to service or service-connected disabilities.

The veteran's claim for an increased disability evaluation for his service-connected back disorder is being remanded due to the absence of complete treatment records from a VA facility. The claims folder will be returned to the Board after obtaining relevant medical records.

The Board has determined that VA facilities were available to provide the care provided at Winchester Medical Center, but due to a lack of critical care beds in Martinsburg VAMC and other factors, no transfer was feasible. The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement is denied.

The veteran is seeking a higher evaluation for her service-connected residuals of a left little toe bunionectomy. The Board has ordered the case back to the RO for additional development, including obtaining an examination and medical opinions regarding whether her service-connected disability has aggravated other foot conditions.

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient examination and opinion regarding whether the veteran's current lower extremity symptoms are related to his in-service exposure to cold weather conditions. The claim is pending for further development.

The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including a VA examination and opinion regarding the etiology of the veteran's cataract in the right eye.