Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claim for service connection for basal cell carcinoma before a decision was made by the Board.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection as there is no medical evidence linking his postoperative residuals for tumors of the parotid glands to his military service.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current lung disability and denied service connection for this condition. The issue of bilateral trench foot is addressed in the REMAND portion of the decision.
The appellant wishes to withdraw her appeal regarding whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen a service connection claim for cause of the veteran's death.
The VA determined that the veteran's right eye condition, resulting from a past injury during service, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating due to his visual acuity and lack of significant functional impairment.
The Board finds that the appellant's Substantive Appeal was timely filed, allowing her appeal to proceed for the issue of entitlement to DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
The veteran has withdrawn his appeal for service connection claims related to arthritis of the right big toe, a liver cyst, and a lymph node disorder.
The appellant withdrew her appeal regarding the apportionment of the veteran's benefits, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death and for Dependents' Educational Assistance, concluding that ALS did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to herbicide exposure in Vietnam.
The veteran's bunions of the left and right great toes are each assigned a 10% evaluation, effective December 9, 2003.
The veteran's claim for nonservice-connected pension was denied as he does not meet the basic service eligibility requirements.
The Board found that the veteran's postoperative right foot bunion with hallux valgus produced impairment consistent with no more than moderate foot injury, and therefore denied a rating in excess of 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the veteran's varicose veins of the right leg do not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as they do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation based on persistent edema or stasis pigmentation/eczema.
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA medical opinion regarding whether the veteran's death was related to service or a service-connected condition, and because records from Dorothy McCormick Center and Tri-State Radiation Oncology are needed.
The Board found that the veteran's chronic metatarsalgia, status post osteotomy of the left third toe, and bilateral hallux valgus do not more closely approximate a moderately severe foot injury warranting a higher disability rating.
The case is being remanded for the veteran's representative to provide argument in support of his claim, as he has not been given an opportunity to do so.
The Board has granted a 10 percent evaluation for the veteran's residuals of right inguinal hernia repair with entrapment of the ilio-inguinal nerve, finding that this impairment is severe.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to new evidence linking his right arm pain to a VA-administered flu shot in October 1998, but denied the underlying claim as there was no fault on the part of VA or an unforeseeable event.
The Board denied the veteran's motion alleging clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a prior August 1968 RO decision that denied service connection for bilateral hip disabilities. The Board found no CUE.
The Board found no evidence of a chronic ulcer or rectal bleeding disorder during service and denied the veteran's claims for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.