Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The veteran seeks to reopen his claim for service connection for degenerative joint disease of the third metacarpophalangeal joint. The previous denial was based on a lack of new and material evidence, but the appeal is now remanded due to the need for additional development.
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of scheduled Travel Board hearing and requests for additional evidence.
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen his claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of recognized service, and thus he is not considered a veteran for purposes of VA benefits.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral detached retinas secondary to diabetes mellitus and a rating higher than 30 percent for total left knee arthroplasty, as of January 1, 2003.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a left heel disorder and residuals of dental trauma due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the veteran's erectile dysfunction is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The RO must obtain VA medical records and arrange for a new examination to determine if ED was caused or aggravated by DM.
The Board finds that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of a skin disorder and therefore, service connection for a skin disorder is denied.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current low back disability is unrelated to his military service and may not be presumed incurred therein.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information and evidence, and a need for readjudication after obtaining all relevant medical records.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for DIC benefits as she is over the age of 18 and does not qualify as a 'child' under VA regulations.
The veteran is seeking service connection for a skin disease of the lower extremities, specifically dermatophytosis. The VA has determined that further examination and opinion are needed to determine if this condition is related to his military service.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions, as well as further development of the record.
The veteran's service-connected right index finger distal amputation is characterized by loss of distal portion, including amputation to the base of the middle phalanx. The criteria for an increased rating of 20 percent have been met.
The Board found that the veteran did not have malnutrition, malaria, or diarrhea due to service and denied his claims.
The Board found that the veteran's payments to his live-in companion were properly considered income for pension purposes, resulting in an overpayment of $31,930.
The Board found that the cause of the veteran's death was cardiovascular disease/ischemic stoke, which is not service-connected. The appellant's claims for accrued benefits were also denied as there is no evidence linking these conditions to service or service-connected disabilities.
The veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 60 percent for service-connected residuals, spontaneous pneumothorax was denied. The claim for TDIU benefits prior to September 24, 2003, was also denied.
The Board denied the veteran's request for an earlier effective date of February 20, 2004, for a 30 percent disability rating for panic disorder. The RO found that it was factually ascertainable on February 20, 2004, that there had been an increase in severity to meet the criteria for a 30 percent rating.
The Board has determined that the veteran's duodenal ulcer does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation, as there is no evidence of anemia, vomiting, hematemesis or melena. The current 20% rating adequately reflects the veteran's symptoms.
The veteran's service-connected history of malaria with splenic hematoma is not currently active, and there are no residuals that would warrant a compensable rating.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.