Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for death benefits, including Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) and death pension due to her not meeting the legal criteria for eligibility.
The Board found that the veteran's bilateral athlete's foot, to include jungle rot, was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied his claim.
The Board denied service connection for left testicle, salivary gland, and throat disabilities due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to radiation exposure during service.
The veteran does not have a residual disability of an inservice surgical correction of congenital hammer toes of the feet, bilaterally.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA death benefits due to a forfeiture of rights after P.E.M. committed mutiny, resulting in his dishonorable discharge.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for an effective date prior to July 13, 2004, for a grant of surviving spouse's aid and attendance for accrued benefits purposes.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for swollen lymph nodes and a skin disorder other than his service-connected prurigo, finding no competent medical evidence of current conditions related to military service or herbicide exposure.
The Board found that the veteran's thoracic spine disability existed prior to her entry into service and did not increase in severity during service. As a result, it was determined that the current disability is not related to service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's loss of vision in his right eye was not caused by VA carelessness, negligence, or lack of proper skill. The event leading to this disability (a hemorrhage due to macular degeneration) was not reasonably foreseeable.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current eye disorder, cold injury to his fingers, or pulmonary disorder as a result of service. Therefore, the claims for these conditions are denied.
The Board has remanded the case for further development to verify the appellant's service under claimed names.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication, including scheduling a VA medical examination to determine the current nature and severity of the veteran's service-connected bilateral leg stress fractures.
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a right hand injury and denied increased ratings for the veteran's right knee retropatellar pain syndrome and initial rating in excess of 20 percent for his right hip strain.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current right inguinal hernia or gastrointestinal disorder related to his military service. The claims are denied.
The Board found that the appellant and the veteran did not have a valid common law marriage after their divorce in 1999, and therefore denied her claim for recognition as the surviving spouse.
The Board has ordered additional development to determine if the veteran was exposed to radiation or asbestos during his military service, which could potentially grant service connection for the cause of death. The case is currently remanded for further investigation and evidence collection.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current eye disorders, including right eye amblyopia and macular degeneration, are not related to his active military service. The claim for service connection is denied.
The Board denied service connection for a disability manifested by leg cramps, finding that the veteran's complaints were not related to his active duty service and did not meet the criteria for service connection due to undiagnosed illness.
The Board determined that the veteran's atypical psychosis did not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 30 percent prior to December 22, 2006.
The Board granted an earlier effective date of September 15, 1977 for the award of service connection for ulcerative colitis. The veteran's former attorney is entitled to 20% of past-due benefits resulting from this decision.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.