Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board finds that the veteran's current adhesive capsulitis and arthritis are not related to service, but grants service connection for these conditions based on direct evidence of their existence.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a right ankle disorder incurred in or aggravated by active service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
The appellant's income exceeded the maximum limit for death pension benefits, and her claim is denied.
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to the appellant withdrawing their appeal prior to a decision being made.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a dental condition and denied entitlement to an increased rating for urticaria.,The veteran's claim of reopening her dental condition was denied due to lack of new and material evidence. Her urticaria claim was also denied as there is no evidence that it meets the criteria for a higher rating.
The Board has denied the veteran's request to reopen his claims for service connection for dizziness, blurred vision, and a skin rash secondary to radiation exposure. The evidence submitted since the final denial is considered duplicative or cumulative.
The veteran's residuals of a left index finger laceration do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA's rating schedule.
The VA Medical Center (VAMC) in Togus, Maine canceled the veteran's fee-basis ID card due to medical feasibility for his needs at an available VA medical facility. The case is being remanded for a Supplemental Statement of the Case that includes applicable laws and regulations.
The veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for chronic neck strain is being remanded due to the need for a new examination and additional medical records.
The Board found no evidence of a skin disorder or numbness in hands and feet that was incurred during service, including due to herbicide exposure. The veteran's claims for these conditions were denied.
The appeal is being remanded due to the appellant's failure to appear for a scheduled hearing and her motion to reschedule. The case will be returned to the RO for scheduling a new hearing before a traveling Veterans Law Judge.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings of his service-connected residuals of fragment wounds have been denied as the evidence does not show that they are more than currently assigned.
The Board has determined that the evidence submitted does not meet the criteria to reopen the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The Board found that the VA's decision to grant an increased apportionment of $300 per month for E.A., the veteran's spouse, was proper. The decision considered the veteran's financial situation and the need to support his child.
The Board has determined that the veteran's celiac disease is reasonably shown to have had its origins during his period of active service and grants service connection for this condition.
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to a finding that the appellant did not live continuously with the veteran from the date of marriage until his death.
The Board found that the veteran's adjustment disorder with depressed mood was not caused or aggravated by his service-connected lichenoid dermatitis. The claim for increased rating of lichenoid dermatitis is remanded.
The veteran had no pending claims at the time of his death, and thus does not meet the legal criteria for accrued benefits.
The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized private medical expenses incurred in April 2004 at St. Petersburg General Hospital is granted as VA facilities were not feasibly available to provide the care.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the addition of his wife as a dependent was denied because there was no error in applying governing law and regulations, and he did not file a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD).
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.