Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the veteran's left knee disability does not warrant a higher rating from March 14, 2000 to April 13, 2005. The evidence shows full range of motion and no instability.
The veteran's income for the year 2003 exceeded the threshold amount required for treatment in the VA health care system without a copayment, and his eligibility status was changed to 'copayment required'. As a result, the appeal is denied.
The Board found that the veteran's metastatic breast cancer is related to exposure to organic solvents and refrigerants in service, specifically carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethylene.
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death due to radiation exposure during Operation Crossroads and asbestos exposure in service, finding no evidence linking these exposures to the veteran's conditions.
The VA denied the veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for retroperitoneal fibrosis, finding that his disability did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
The Board found that the veteran's recurrent nose bleeds were incurred during service and granted service connection.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current gastrointestinal disorder did not have its onset during active service and is not related to any in-service disease or injury. As a result, the claim for service connection for gastrointestinal disorder is denied.
The veteran's service-connected right foot hammertoes and associated nerve damage do not warrant evaluations in excess of the current ratings.
The veteran's service-connected right knee disability, characterized by chondromalacia patella, meniscal tears, and instability, was rated at 20 percent from November 12, 2002, to April 16, 2003, and from July 1, 2003, to August 17, 2003. The RO denied an increased rating for this period.
The Board has ordered the case remanded for additional development, including providing notice to the appellant regarding what evidence would be necessary to substantiate her claim of new and material evidence.
The VA denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's left shoulder rotator cuff tear, as his condition is currently rated at 20 percent.
The veteran's case was dismissed because he did not file a timely substantive appeal regarding the issue of an increased rating for tension type cephalgia.
The veteran's seborrhea was rated at 10% prior to August 30, 2002 and at 30% thereafter. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating under either the old or new criteria.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to warrant reopening the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral ear disability on other than an Agent Orange basis. The case is now remanded for further development, including a VA examination.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not currently have a diagnosed pulmonary disability, and thus service connection for this condition is denied.
The Board has determined that a VA examination is necessary to address the nature and etiology of the veteran's claimed PTSD condition. The case is REMANDED for further development.
The Board has granted service connection for dysthymic disorder as secondary to the service-connected right ankle disability and assigned a 30 percent rating.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected chronic active gastritis with intermittent bile reflux, status post hemigastrectomy and Billroth II warrants a disability rating of 60 percent, as this is the highest schedular rating available for his condition.
The veteran's daughter seeks accrued benefits based on unreimbursed medical expenses, but the claim was denied as she did not provide proof of payment.
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for additional development and consideration of the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of frozen feet and bilateral leg injuries. The veteran is entitled to a hearing before RO personnel or an explanation as to why he is not entitled to another hearing.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.