Peripheral neuropathy decisions — 2001
212 indexed Board decisions in 2001.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a low back strain, skin disorder, and peripheral neuropathy. The claim for an increased rating for bursitis of the feet, ankles, and hands was not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2001
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy due to exposure to herbicides. The appeal is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2001
The veteran's case is being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and a supplemental statement of the case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2001
The veteran's appeal is about his service-connected disabilities and whether he should receive higher levels of special monthly compensation based on the severity of his conditions. The RO has ordered additional VA examinations to assess the current level of impairment resulting from his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2001
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a seizure disorder. The veteran's low back disability is currently evaluated at 20 percent, which reflects moderate limitation of motion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2001
The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication, including a VA examination to determine if the veteran currently has acute or subacute peripheral neuropathy as a residual of Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The Board has granted a 10 percent rating for cold injury residuals of the left foot and right foot, along with a separate 10 percent rating for peripheral neuropathy in each foot.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · April 2001
The veteran's carcinoma of the tongue and metastatic squamous cell cancer of cervical nodes were not shown to be related to service, including exposure to Agent Orange.,Peripheral neuropathy was not shown to be related to service or due to exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2001
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, including as secondary to exposure to Agent Orange, and entitlement to an increased initial rating for service-connected right knee disability due to incomplete development of records.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · April 2001
The Board has granted service connection for the veteran's bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, finding that his exposure to Agent Orange during service is presumed and directly caused his current condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed chronic cervical spine disability and bilateral hand numbness were not incurred or aggravated by active military service. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy and excessive itching, joint pains, abdominal pains, hypertension, scars from shrapnel wounds of the left shoulder, PTSD, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. The appeals are based on secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The veteran's service-connected residuals of frozen feet and peripheral neuropathy are rated at 20 percent each since January 12, 1998.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has determined that the veteran's current groin or right leg disability, specifically right femoral neuropathy, is not related to his VA treatment in March 1999. The appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The veteran is entitled to VA payment or reimbursement for medical expenses incurred in November 12, 1998 due to a motor vehicle accident. The claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy and reopening of the malaria and diabetes claims are referred to the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The Board denied the veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance or on account of being housebound due to his service-connected disabilities. The veteran had a combined rating of 90 percent for residuals of a shell fragment wound of the right buttock and thigh, including sciatic neuropathy of the right lower extremity.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The Board has granted service connection for a left arm disorder and peripheral neuropathy. The remaining issues of service connection for PTSD, a left shoulder disorder, and a skin disorder are addressed in the Remand section.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedApril 2001
The veteran's claims for service connection for labyrinthitis and left hand neuropathy have been granted with effective dates of December 21, 1991, and July 10, 1995, respectively. However, the claim for clear and unmistakable error regarding tinnitus has not been perfected.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2001
The Board has granted service connection for frostbite of the toes and fingers, bilaterally, with cold sensitivity and neuropathy as incurred in active service. Additionally, a 10 percent evaluation is assigned for cervical strain.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2001
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing or following any substantially gainful occupation.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.