Peripheral neuropathy decisions — 2004
358 indexed Board decisions in 2004.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's current diagnosis of diffuse peripheral neuropathy is not related to his service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected disabilities are being remanded to allow for additional examinations and consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board denied an initial disability rating in excess of 20 percent for the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus type II, finding that his condition was adequately managed with oral hypoglycemic agents and a regulated diet.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The veteran's non-service connected disabilities, including a chronic low back disorder and obesity, are deemed to render him unemployable. As such, he is not eligible for SDVI.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2004
The Board found that the veteran's peripheral neuropathy was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current skin, urinary tract infection, eye, vein, and peripheral neuropathy disabilities. The veteran's claim for service connection for hearing loss is reopened.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a VA examination regarding his peripheral neuropathy and its relation to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for his left S1 radiculopathy and peripheral neuropathy, residuals of shell fragment wound of the buttocks, and residuals of shell fragment wounds to the right and left thighs.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and further development of the secondary service connection issue.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the veteran's peripheral neuropathy and readjudicating both issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to conflicting medical evidence regarding ischemic heart disease and incomplete information in the claims file.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2004
The Board granted a rating of 100 percent for hepatitis C with cirrhosis of the liver prior to July 2, 2001 and a rating greater than 60 percent from July 2, 2001. The veteran's diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral neuropathy, and thyroid disorder are found to be proximately due to or the result of service-connected hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2004
The Board found that the veteran's fatal myocardial infarction was not caused by or related to his service-connected disabilities, and thus denied service connection for the cause of death. The appellant also failed to meet the requirements for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · May 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy due to exposure to Agent Orange, finding that there was no evidence of acute or subacute peripheral neuropathy during his service in Vietnam and that any current condition is not related to his presumed exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's ulnar neuropathy of the left hand does not warrant a rating in excess of 20 percent, as it is currently productive of no more than moderate impairment. A separate evaluation of 10 percent for superficial and painful scarring on the left hand is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The veteran's claims for service connection and special monthly compensation are being remanded due to incomplete development of the record, including obtaining medical records and arranging for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2004
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a comprehensive examination of her service-connected disorders and consideration of all applicable criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, finding that it was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, including as secondary to exposure to Agent Orange.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.