Peripheral neuropathy decisions — 2004
358 indexed Board decisions in 2004.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for multiple lipomas, lung disability, peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities (peripheral neuropathy), and testicle disability, all related to exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were incurred or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran seeks service connection for peripheral neuropathy, which he claims is due to his exposure to Agent Orange during service in Vietnam. The Board has ordered additional development of the record and a VA examination to determine if there is a link between the veteran's current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The Board has determined that the RO's denial of service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy claimed as secondary to service-connected type II diabetes mellitus was not supported by evidence, and further development is needed.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations and service connection for hearing loss, diabetic polyneuropathy of the legs, and surgical residuals of the right knee were denied. The Board found no evidence to support a finding that any current disabilities are related to military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development and adjudication due to procedural issues, including a duty to notify under the VCAA.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations and compensable ratings for his service-connected traumatic neuropathy of the left hand and gunshot wounds to the left lower extremity, finding that the evidence did not warrant higher evaluations based on the current level of disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The Board has remanded the case due to procedural deficiencies and the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of the veteran's peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation based on need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2004
The VA has granted a 30 percent evaluation for right ulnar neuropathy secondary to a gunshot wound, effective June 15, 2004.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran is seeking compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for right arm and hand neuropathy, as well as neuropathy of legs and feet, both related to his February 1999 coronary artery bypass graft surgery at a VA Medical Center. The case has been remanded for further examination and review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran is seeking service connection for bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, which he claims is secondary to herbicide exposure during his Vietnam service. The VA has ordered a remand due to the uncertainty of the etiology and the need for further examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the veteran's claims, including obtaining medical opinions and scheduling examinations to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus with onychomycosis and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher disability ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus II with sensorimotor polyneuropathy, finding that it was not incurred in or aggravated by his active duty service and could not be presumed to have been caused by exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2004
The Board found no evidence of a bilateral eye disability, optic neuropathy, or glaucoma in service and denied the claim for service connection. The veteran's PTSD was also not granted as service connected.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for a travel Board hearing as to the issues of service connection for peripheral neuropathy, both hands due to herbicide exposure and entitlement to special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2004
The Board has granted service connection for peripheral neuropathy secondary to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension benefits based on the need for regular aid and attendance or on housebound status is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and consideration of all relevant evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2004
The Board restored the veteran's original 30 percent evaluation for residuals of a right wrist fracture and remanded the issue of an earlier effective date to the RO.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2004
The veteran's claim is being remanded for further development, including obtaining medical records and providing a VA examination to determine the identity and etiology of any left shoulder disorder.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.