Peripheral neuropathy decisions — 2005
537 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and granted an increased rating for the right elbow. The veteran's ulnar neuropathy in his right hand was found to be related to his service-connected arthritis/bursitis/tendonitis of the right elbow.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied service connection for the claimed conditions, finding no evidence of such conditions during or after service and no link to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further medical evaluation and opinion regarding the veteran's upper extremity disability, which is currently service-connected as secondary to a service-connected laminectomy. The appeal will be reconsidered after the additional testing results are available.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2005
The veteran's appeals for service connection were withdrawn, and the Board dismissed his claims due to lack of evidence supporting the claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied service connection for organic heart disease and peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the claims. The veteran's current conditions are presumed due to in-service herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including PTSD and a skin disability. The decision also addressed other issues such as diabetes mellitus, hearing loss, and sleep apnea.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for various service-connected disabilities were denied. The initial disability ratings assigned for diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, diabetic nephropathy, and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy were all found to be inadequate.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus and its related conditions, finding no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides or other causative factors.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have diabetic neuropathy of the hands and feet, which is a result of disease or injury incurred in service. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a loss of visual acuity, traumatic arthritis of the low back, or peripheral neuropathy due to service. The evidence does not support these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed PTSD was not incurred as a result of his active military service due to lack of credible supporting evidence for the occurrence of the claimed in-service stressors.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran is entitled to a separate compensable rating of 10 percent for his peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The case is being remanded to obtain the exact dates of the veteran's Active Duty for Training (ACDUTRA) and Inactive Duty Training (INACDUTRA) while serving in the Tennessee National Guard. The veteran has not provided this information, and VA must pursue it until a responsible custodian reports they are unavailable or that further effort would be futile.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The Board has determined that additional examinations are necessary to determine the nature and etiology of the veteran's conditions, including hypertension, tinnitus, hearing loss, prostatitis, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy. The RO will also review the expanded record and readjudicate the issues on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The RO denied service connection for several conditions, including diabetic retinopathy, status post cardiovascular accident times two, hypertension, status post myocardial infarction, bilateral hearing loss, Hepatitis A, B and C, and neuropathy of the left upper extremity. The veteran's appeal is currently pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 as his left leg amputation was not caused by VA care or lack thereof.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The Board has remanded two issues for further development: entitlement to increased ratings for left S1 radiculopathy and peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, and residuals of a gunshot wound of the buttocks. The VA will conduct additional examinations and review the claims based on the Joint Motion.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied service connection for a right hip disorder and an increased rating for traumatic neuropathy of the right saphenous nerve. The claim for a separate rating for post-operative right thigh scar is pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral foot disorder, including pes planus and peripheral neuropathy, is not related to his service-connected left knee disability. The claim for increased rating of the left knee disability remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2005
The Board has granted service connection for cold injury residuals, including recurrent fungal infections and peripheral neuropathy of the feet. The veteran's current symptoms are found to be related to his in-service exposure to cold weather.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.