Peripheral neuropathy decisions — 2020
3,326 indexed Board decisions in 2020.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his left and right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the femoral and sciatic nerves were denied. The Veteran was granted a separate rating for diabetic peripheral neuropathy, but this claim is still considered to be on appeal.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2020
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection due to the appellant's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus has been reopened due to new evidence. The claims for diabetic neuropathy and sleep apnea with COPD are being remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the diabetes mellitus claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus type II, diabetic nephropathy, erectile dysfunction, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, are being remanded for further evaluation due to a potential worsening since his last VA examination in June 2015.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations to assess the current severity of his disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Veteran's OSA and CHF are granted as secondary to his service-connected conditions. The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy is granted at a 30% evaluation.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJune 2020
The Board has reopened several service connection claims but denied others. The Veteran's PTSD with insomnia, depression, tinnitus, low back disability, and neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities are now granted. However, his hypertension, bilateral foot disabilities, sleep apnea, right and left upper and lower extremity neuropathies, and heart disability remain denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his left upper extremity neuropathy associated with type II diabetes is denied as the evidence does not support a finding of 'severe' incomplete paralysis or more serious conditions of the nerves in the radicular groups in the left arm, and the most nearly approximated disability level is 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · June 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and the need to obtain private medical records. The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy is presumed to be related to his service in Vietnam, including exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2020
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as she and her representative have withdrawn all issues in appeal status.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected lumbosacral strain is denied.,Service connection for right lower extremity radiculopathy is denied as it is not related to the service-connected lumbosacral strain.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral idiopathic neuropathy and an acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD) are remanded, as well as his claim for TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection due to insufficient verification of the Veteran's claimed service in the Republic of Vietnam. Additional development is needed to verify his alleged service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, arthritis, a vision disorder, neuropathy of the left upper extremity, neuropathy of the right upper extremity, and a kidney disorder. The decision found no in-service incurrence or exposure to herbicides that could support presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and increased ratings for his bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of the femoral nerve, finding that there was no factual basis to grant such requests.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's appeals for higher ratings for right 2nd and 3rd finger lacerations, laceration scars, and peripheral neuropathy were denied. The rash of the scrotum was also denied.,Bilateral hearing loss disability was also denied.,Right hand peripheral neuropathy received a 20 percent rating from April 1971 through July 18, 2019.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has already granted effective dates for the evaluations, but the Court ordered a remand due to missing VA medical records. The AOJ needs to obtain any outstanding VA medical records and provide an effective date prior to February 2, 2012.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including prostate cancer, peripheral neuropathy, and diabetic peripheral vascular disease, rendered him unable to obtain or maintain substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the schedular threshold percentage requirements for a TDIU under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a). The claim is remanded to be submitted to VA’s Director of Compensation Service for extraschedular consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to in-service exposure to an herbicide agent, including for neuropathy of both feet, diabetes mellitus, and a left eye disability. The AOJ is required to conduct additional development to determine if the Veteran served within 12 nautical miles of the Republic of Vietnam during his service onboard U.S.S. PICKAWAY.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for left ulnar neuropathy and PFB were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support higher ratings based on the severity of his conditions.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.