Peripheral neuropathy Board decisions
38,945 indexed Board decisions for Peripheral neuropathy.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's low back disability does not warrant a higher rating, and his claim for separate evaluation of left lower extremity neuropathy was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's case is remanded for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and VA treatment records. The Veteran will be scheduled for a VA examination to assess his employability due to service-connected disabilities. If deemed necessary, the case will then be referred to the Director of Compensation and Pension Service for extra-schedular consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's hypertension and peripheral neuropathy, bilateral lower extremities. The case will be remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right ulnar nerve neuropathy is a result of carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA during his July 2004 carpectomy at the VA Medical Center. As such, the criteria for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 have been met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetic retinopathy (to include cataracts) and bilateral neuropathy of the upper extremities are being remanded due to insufficient evidence. The case will be returned to the RO via the AMC for additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to obtain service treatment records, arrange for a VA examination, and address conflicting opinions in the claims file.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2011
The Board has ordered additional development to determine the cause of the Veteran's death and whether his service-connected disabilities contributed to it. The case is now remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need to verify his exposure to herbicide agents in Thailand and/or the Philippines, which is required by VA regulations. The Veteran also needs to provide authorization for private treatment records related to his hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's claim for reopening the service connection for hypertension as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus (DM) has been successful, and his claims for service connection for other conditions have been remanded.,An initial compensable evaluation for a stomach scar is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran is seeking service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities. The Board has determined that additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records from 2004 to present, private treatment records from Drs. M and G, and Worker's Compensation benefits records, is necessary before a decision can be made.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Board found that the Veteran does not currently suffer from peripheral neuropathy of either lower extremity.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy was denied as there is no evidence of current disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, chronic tinnitus, a chronic skin disorder (claimed as eczema and/or chloracne), peripheral neuropathy, and Type II diabetes mellitus were all denied. The evidence did not show any in-service or post-service connection to these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to determine the etiology of his obstructive sleep apnea.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and a medical opinion regarding his employability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Board has ordered the case to be remanded for further development, including obtaining additional VA treatment records and scheduling a neurological examination. The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of his service-connected peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity will be reconsidered.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Board found no evidence of the Veteran's service in Vietnam and thus denied his claims for service connection based on herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities, finding no evidence linking the condition to his military service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the etiology of his multiple myeloma and peripheral neuropathy disorders.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.