Peripheral neuropathy Board decisions
38,945 indexed Board decisions for Peripheral neuropathy.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · February 2011
The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities is found to be due to exposure to herbicide agents during service, and thus granted service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for hypertension, peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities have been withdrawn. The case is being remanded to further evaluate his claims for tinnitus, PTSD, and TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's claim for service connection for cold injury to both feet, including sensory neuropathy, arthritis, cold sensitivity with Raynaud's phenomenon, recurrent onychomycosis, callus and corn formation from sensory neuropathy, is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and conducting VA examinations to determine the etiology of the Veteran's claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine if his bilateral upper extremity peripheral neuropathy and erectile dysfunction are related to service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a stomach disorder, cardiovascular disorder, peripheral neuropathy of upper and lower extremities. The decision found that new evidence did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the underlying issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, as his combined disability rating is only 50 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to his request for a personal hearing before the Board. The issues of service connection for polyneuropathy associated with herbicide exposure, Graves disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for posttraumatic stress disorder are pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's SMC was reduced from the housebound rate to the 'K' rate for loss of use of a creative organ. The Board has determined that additional development is necessary due to the reduction in his disability rating and need for an examination to determine if he needs regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy is reasonably shown to be proximately due to or the result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus grants service connection for this condition on a secondary basis. The issue of service connection for tinnitus remains pending as it was not addressed in the decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's service-connected anxiety disorder does not render him so helpless as to be in need of regular aid and attendance or permanently bedridden due to his nonservice-connected medical conditions. Therefore, he is not entitled to special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board found no relationship between the Veteran's current peripheral neuropathy and essential tremor of the hands with his service, including exposure to herbicides in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for diabetes mellitus, type 2 and related conditions were denied. The RO found that the current rating of 40 percent adequately reflects the severity of his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen any of the Veteran's service connection claims, including for peripheral neuropathy of the right leg, left leg, elbow, neck, low back, shoulder disabilities, carpal tunnel syndrome, or heart disorder. The claimant's statements regarding abdominal pain are deemed not credible.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Board has determined that additional VA examinations and medical opinions are needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims for service connection, increased evaluations, and TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2011
The Veteran's claim for TDIU is being remanded due to the need for additional examination and development of records. The issues of service connection for sleep apnea and restless leg syndrome are also referred for adjudication.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Board denied service connection for neuropathy of the feet and chronic infection of the feet, finding no evidence linking these conditions to service or a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2011
The Board has determined that the evidence is at least in equipoise and supports the claim for service connection for primary lateral sclerosis (previously diagnosed as polyneuropathy), with reasonable doubt resolved in favor of the Veteran. Service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2011
The Veteran's right elbow disability is currently rated as 20 percent disabling, and his right ulnar neuropathy is rated as 10 percent disabling. The Board finds that the current ratings are adequate based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · February 2011
The Board found that the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy did not have onset in service and was not caused or aggravated by his active military service, including exposure to Agent Orange.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.