Peripheral neuropathy Board decisions
38,945 indexed Board decisions for Peripheral neuropathy.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board denied service connection for a right lower extremity disorder, other than the already service-connected right common peroneal neuropathy with foot drop and neuropathic pain. The veteran's left lower extremity disorder was granted service connection as secondary to his service-connected right common peroneal neuropathy with foot drop and neuropathic pain.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating in any of his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The veteran's claims for increased ratings and compensable ratings were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher disability ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board found that the veteran's peripheral neuropathy did not originate in service or within one year thereafter, and it is not related to any incident of service or service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claim for a service-connected burial allowance, finding that the veteran's death was not related to service or a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2006
The veteran's appeal for service connection for peripheral neuropathy has been dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2006
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection due to new evidence linking his left eye disorder to a motor vehicle accident during active duty training in Hawaii. The Board granted service connection for optic neuropathy of the left eye.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2006
The Board is considering both claims of entitlement to service connection for peripheral neuropathy, one secondary to herbicide exposure and the other secondary to diabetes mellitus. The appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of any currently diagnosed peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2006
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, as well as a higher rating for Type II Diabetes Mellitus, were granted. The specific conditions are rated based on their severity.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board found that the veteran's peripheral neuropathy was not related to his service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The preponderance of evidence did not support a finding of service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board found that the veteran's impotence is not secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus and denied the claim. The neuropathy claim was also considered, but no additional medical records were provided by the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus and bilateral peripheral neuropathy, finding that his diabetes did not require regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of degenerative disc disease, peripheral neuropathy, left knee arthritis, bilateral hearing loss, or tinnitus. Therefore, service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's peripheral neuropathy of both feet is not due to disease or injury incurred in service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2006
The Board found that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the veteran's current ulnar nerve neuropathy is related to his in-service right hand injury and surgery, thus denying service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to various issues and claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · August 2006
The Board found that the veteran's bilateral peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities was not incurred in or aggravated by service, nor could it be presumed to have been caused by exposure to Agent Orange. The evidence did not support a link between the veteran's current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his lumbar spine and right hand disabilities due to failure without good cause to report for necessary VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected residuals of a fracture of the right tarsal cuboid, to include peripheral neuropathy, warrant an increased rating from 10 percent to 20 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2006
The veteran's service-connected peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity is currently rated at 10 percent, and his erectile dysfunction does not meet criteria for a compensable evaluation. Service connection for PTSD was denied.
← Back to Peripheral neuropathy overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.