Peripheral neuropathy Board decisions

The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of her service-connected right brachial plexus neuropathy is being remanded due to conflicting clinical findings and the need for further examination. The RO must consider whether a separate disability rating is warranted based on complaints regarding her right lower extremity.

The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient medical examination and procedural issues.

The veteran seeks service connection for acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy as a result of Agent Orange exposure. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records and conduct further examination.

The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to service connection for PTSD, asthma, and neuropathy of the left superficial peroneal nerve. The RO is instructed to address these issues in accordance with VA regulations and procedures.

The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a skin disorder of the feet or bilateral peripheral neuropathy due to Agent Orange exposure in service. The claim for these conditions is denied.

The Board determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, to include as secondary to service-connected scar residuals of a gunshot wound of the left buttock and sacral region. The RO denied this claim in June 1997.

The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of VCAA notice, and further development is required.

The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy secondary to Agent Orange exposure, but it is unclear whether this decision grants or denies the original claim as the issue of service connection remains pending.

The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining treatment records and scheduling a VA examination. The veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus and service connection for diabetic neuropathy of both lower extremities are inextricably intertwined with his TDIU claim.

The veteran is seeking service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities and arthritis of the knees, both claimed as secondary to his service-connected residuals of cold weather injuries in the lower extremities. The Board finds that a remand is necessary to clarify whether service connection has been established for these disabilities and to obtain an opinion on their etiology.

The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for sinusitis. The veteran's current diagnosis of sinusitis is not shown to be related to his active military service, as there is no evidence of chronic or continuing sinusitis in service or after service. However, the Board finds that ulnar neuropathy of the right hand is likely caused by the veteran's service-connected shell fragment wounds to the right humerus and grants this claim.

The veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy of the legs, and PTSD were denied. Service connection for a back disorder was also denied.

The Board has determined that the veteran's ischemic optic neuropathy is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, a visual disorder, gastrointestinal disability, and chloracne due to exposure to Agent Orange. The appeals for special monthly compensation due to loss of use of a creative organ are remanded.

The Board has determined that the veteran's appeal is mixed, with some issues granted and others denied. The veteran was granted service connection for various conditions but had his hearing loss rating continued at noncompensable level.

The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, lung disorder, bowel disorder, bladder disorder, and skin disorder (other than tinea cruris), all of which are claimed to be due to Agent Orange herbicide exposure. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions were incurred in or aggravated by service.

The veteran's claims for an initial compensable evaluation for diabetic retinopathy and an effective date prior to July 18, 2001 are being remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and a VA examination.

The veteran seeks service connection for left hand neuropathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, and polycystic ovary disease. She also requests an increased evaluation for her ganglionectomy residuals. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records and to schedule examinations.

The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development and consideration of his claims, including a dental examination to assess the extent of bone loss in his jaw.