Prostate cancer decisions — 2005
198 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board found that the veteran's prostate cancer residuals do not warrant a rating in excess of 20 percent, as his symptoms are primarily urinary frequency and occasional incontinence.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer, colon cancer, and a rectal condition manifested by a strong uncontrollable odor due to lack of medical evidence confirming these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board found that the veteran's prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and colon polyps were not present in service or related to service. The claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's residuals of prostate cancer are rated at 40 percent, effective from January 25, 2001 to September 4, 2003. He also received a compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and renal cancer, finding that there is no competent evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy, coronary artery disease, and diabetic retinopathy. The veteran did not have military service in Vietnam or exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of prostatectomy more nearly approximate a disability rating of 60 percent due to urine leakage, as defined by VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2005
The veteran has withdrawn his appeal, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board found no evidence of prostate cancer during service or within one year post-service, and there is no presumption of exposure to herbicides. The veteran's current diagnosis of prostate cancer was not linked to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board denied service connection for major depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), skin cancer, prostate cancer, and colon bleeding (diagnosed as colitis) due to a lack of medical evidence linking these conditions to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The veteran's claim of an increased rating for PTSD was denied due to his failure to report for scheduled VA examinations. The service connection claim for prostate cancer was also denied as there is no evidence that the condition is related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have prostate cancer and therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran's erectile dysfunction, as secondary to service-connected prostate cancer and status post radial prostatectomy, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA disability evaluation guidelines.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2005
The veteran's prostate cancer is rated at 40 percent disabling, effective February 11, 1999. The claim for erectile dysfunction secondary to prostate cancer is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2005
The Board has granted service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus, finding that the veteran was exposed to herbicides in Vietnam during his active military duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2005
The veteran's prostate cancer was not incurred in or aggravated by service and service connection may not be presumed due to exposure to herbicides. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2005
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his VA treatment records and re-adjudication.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2005
The veteran is seeking service connection for prostate cancer, which he claims is related to his exposure to Agent Orange during military service. The Board has ordered additional development of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2005
The veteran does not have prostate cancer attributable to his military service and the claim is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2005
The VA has granted a 60 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected prostate cancer with urinary incontinence, which is the maximum schedular rating available under the circumstances.
← Back to Prostate cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.